Suppr超能文献

白蛋白在德国、意大利和西班牙治疗失代偿期肝硬化中的成本效益。

The cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain.

作者信息

Runken M Chris, Caraceni Paolo, Fernandez Javier, Zipprich Alexander, Carlton Rashad, Bunke Martin

机构信息

Grifols Shared Services North America (SSNA), Inc., Research Triangle Park, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0237-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Albumin is frequently prescribed in cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation. However, the true cost effectiveness of albumin use in cirrhotic patients is still under debate.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain.

METHODS

A decision-tree economic model was developed to evaluate treatments for decompensated cirrhosis from the hospital perspective over a typical inpatient admission. The treatments for large volume paracentesis (LVP) were albumin vs saline, gelatin, or no fluid. The treatments for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) were albumin plus antibiotics vs antibiotics alone. The treatments for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) were albumin plus a vasoconstrictor vs a vasoconstrictor alone. Effectiveness inputs were literature-based. Cost inputs included pharmacy costs and medical complication costs of decompensated cirrhosis. The primary model assessments were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life saved and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

RESULTS

Albumin was found to be both less costly and more effective relative to saline, gelatin, and no fluid for the treatment of LVP across all 3 countries. For SBP, albumin plus antibiotics was more clinically effective than antibiotics alone in all 3 countries. The combination of albumin plus antibiotics was less costly than antibiotics alone in Germany and Italy, making albumin a dominant treatment (ie, less costly and more effective). In the management of SBP in Spain, albumin plus antibiotics compared to antibiotics alone resulted in ICERs of €1516 per life saved and €3369 per QALY gained. Albumin plus a vasoconstrictor was both less costly and more effective than vasoconstrictor alone in the treatment of HRS across all 3 countries.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that albumin is cost-effective in terms of lives saved and QALYs gained in the management of decompensated cirrhosis associated with LVP, SBP, or HRS.

摘要

背景

白蛋白常用于急性失代偿期肝硬化患者。然而,白蛋白用于肝硬化患者的真正成本效益仍存在争议。

目的

评估在德国、意大利和西班牙使用白蛋白治疗失代偿期肝硬化的成本效益。

方法

建立决策树经济模型,从医院角度评估典型住院期间失代偿期肝硬化的治疗方法。大量腹腔穿刺放液(LVP)的治疗方法为白蛋白对比生理盐水、明胶或不使用液体。自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的治疗方法为白蛋白联合抗生素对比单纯抗生素。肝肾综合征(HRS)的治疗方法为白蛋白联合血管收缩剂对比单纯血管收缩剂。有效性数据来源于文献。成本数据包括失代偿期肝硬化的药品成本和医疗并发症成本。主要模型评估指标为每挽救一条生命和每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)。

结果

在所有3个国家,相对于生理盐水、明胶和不使用液体,白蛋白治疗LVP成本更低且更有效。对于SBP,在所有3个国家,白蛋白联合抗生素比单纯抗生素临床效果更好。在德国和意大利,白蛋白联合抗生素的成本低于单纯抗生素,使白蛋白成为优势治疗方案(即成本更低且更有效)。在西班牙SBP的治疗中,白蛋白联合抗生素与单纯抗生素相比,每挽救一条生命的ICER为1516欧元,每获得一个QALY的ICER为3369欧元。在所有3个国家,白蛋白联合血管收缩剂治疗HRS比单纯血管收缩剂成本更低且更有效。

结论

该分析表明,在治疗与LVP、SBP或HRS相关的失代偿期肝硬化时,就挽救生命和获得QALY而言,白蛋白具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25db/6734265/d005464c27a1/13561_2019_237_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验