• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚的多学科癌症护理:一项全国性审计凸显了护理方面的差距以及临床医生面临的医疗法律风险。

Multidisciplinary cancer care in Australia: a national audit highlights gaps in care and medico-legal risk for clinicians.

作者信息

Wilcoxon Heidi, Luxford Karen, Saunders Christobel, Peterson Janice, Zorbas Helen

机构信息

National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales School of Surgery, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar;7(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01369.x. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01369.x
PMID:21332649
Abstract

AIM

Multidisciplinary care (MDC) is accepted as best practice in cancer treatment planning and care. Despite recognition of the importance of a team approach, limited data are available about the extent to which MDC has been implemented in Australia. The aim of the audit was to investigate the implementation of MDC for five main cancer types across Australia in line with best practice.

METHODS

A sample of 155 hospitals was surveyed to investigate the status of MDC for cancer treatment planning in Australia across five cancer types (breast, gynecological, lung, prostate and colorectal). The survey investigated team structure, meetings, patient consent, documentation of team recommendations and communication with the patient.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of hospitals surveyed did not have a multidisciplinary team. Of those with such a team; in one-third patients were not informed their case would be discussed by the team, in half patient consent was not sought for all cases discussed by the team, in one-quarter the team's recommended treatment plan was not noted in the patient record. Less than 1% of teams reported routine attendance by the tumour-specific minimum core team.

CONCLUSION

MDC is not being implemented in line with best practice or applied consistently across Australia. This audit has highlighted gaps in care delivery, despite national recommendations about MDC. Areas being neglected can affect the quality of care provided and may put clinicians at medico-legal risk. Recommendations to improve uptake and effectiveness of MDC are provided.

摘要

目的

多学科护理(MDC)被公认为癌症治疗规划与护理的最佳实践。尽管认识到团队协作方法的重要性,但关于MDC在澳大利亚的实施程度,可用数据有限。此次审计的目的是根据最佳实践,调查澳大利亚五种主要癌症类型的MDC实施情况。

方法

对155家医院进行抽样调查,以研究澳大利亚五种癌症类型(乳腺癌、妇科癌症、肺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌)治疗规划中的MDC状况。该调查涵盖团队结构、会议、患者同意、团队建议的记录以及与患者的沟通。

结果

三分之二接受调查的医院没有多学科团队。在有此类团队的医院中,三分之一的医院未告知患者其病例将由团队讨论,一半的医院在团队讨论的所有病例中未征求患者同意,四分之一的医院未在患者记录中注明团队推荐的治疗方案。不到1%的团队报告特定肿瘤最小核心团队有常规出勤。

结论

MDC在澳大利亚未按照最佳实践实施,也未得到一致应用。尽管有关于MDC的国家建议,但此次审计凸显了护理提供方面的差距。被忽视的领域可能会影响所提供护理的质量,并可能使临床医生面临医疗法律风险。文中提供了提高MDC采用率和有效性的建议。

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary cancer care in Australia: a national audit highlights gaps in care and medico-legal risk for clinicians.澳大利亚的多学科癌症护理:一项全国性审计凸显了护理方面的差距以及临床医生面临的医疗法律风险。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar;7(1):34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01369.x. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
Australian breast cancer specialists' involvement in multidisciplinary treatment planning meetings.澳大利亚乳腺癌专家参与多学科治疗计划会议。
Breast. 2008 Aug;17(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 May 1.
3
What constitutes a multidisciplinary team meeting?什么构成了多学科团队会议?
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep;7(3):317. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01429.x.
4
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
5
Analysis of multidisciplinary lung cancer practice.多学科肺癌诊疗实践分析
Intern Med J. 2007 Jan;37(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01237.x.
6
A team-based approach to providing asthma action plans.基于团队的哮喘行动计划提供方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):247-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110145.
7
EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary mission statement on better care for patients with colon and rectal cancer in Europe.EURECCA 结直肠:改善欧洲结直肠癌患者治疗的多学科使命声明。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Sep;49(13):2784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.032. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
A pilot study on understanding the journey of advanced prostate cancer patients.一项关于了解晚期前列腺癌患者病程的试点研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;168:165-71.
9
[Teamwork and team success in multi- and interdisciplinary teams in medical rehabilitation].[医学康复中多学科和跨学科团队的团队合作与团队成功]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Dec;43(6):348-57. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828533.
10
An audit of clinical resources available for the care of head and neck cancer patients in England.对英格兰用于头颈癌患者护理的临床资源的一项审计。
J Laryngol Otol. 2005 Aug;119(8):620-6. doi: 10.1258/0022215054516214.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking the Diagnosis and Management of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Multidisciplinary Transplant Meetings: A Global Survey and Banff Working Group Recommendations.在多学科移植会议中重新思考抗体介导排斥反应的诊断与管理:一项全球调查及班夫工作组建议
Clin Transplant. 2025 May;39(5):e70167. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70167.
2
The complexities, coordination, culture and capacities that characterise the delivery of oncology services in the common areas of ambulatory settings.描述在门诊环境下共同领域提供肿瘤服务的复杂性、协调性、文化和能力的特点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07593-3.
3
The Multidisciplinary Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
肝细胞癌的多学科管理
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021 Aug 5;17(6):405-408. doi: 10.1002/cld.1068. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Medicolegal Considerations in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care.多学科癌症护理中的法医学考量
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2020 Nov 1;1(4):100073. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100073. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
5
Implementation of lung cancer multidisciplinary teams: a review of evidence-practice gaps.肺癌多学科团队的实施:证据与实践差距的综述
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1667-1679. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.32.
6
What is multidisciplinary cancer care like in practice? a protocol for a mixed-method study to characterise ambulatory oncology services in the Australian public sector.多学科癌症护理在实际中是怎样的?一项混合方法研究的方案,旨在描述澳大利亚公共部门的门诊肿瘤学服务。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e031179. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031179.
7
Assessing patients' experiences of cancer care across the treatment pathway: a mapping review of recent psychosocial cancer care publications.评估患者在整个治疗过程中的癌症护理体验:近期心理社会癌症护理文献的映射综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun;27(6):1997-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04740-1. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
8
Scoping clinicians' perspectives on pre-treatment multidisciplinary care for young women with breast cancer.探究临床医生对年轻乳腺癌女性患者治疗前多学科护理的看法。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Oct 9;11:547-555. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S173735. eCollection 2018.
9
Variations in outcomes by residential location for women with breast cancer: a systematic review.乳腺癌女性患者结局因居住地点而异:一项系统评价
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 29;8(4):e019050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019050.
10
Risk communication with Arab patients with cancer: a qualitative study of nurses and pharmacists.与阿拉伯癌症患者的风险沟通:对护士和药剂师的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 1;5(4):e006890. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006890.