Körner M, Bengel J
Abteilung für Rehabilitationspsychologie, Institut für Psychologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Dec;43(6):348-57. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828533.
Multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary team models are often used to describe teams in medical rehabilitation. There is only little evidence whether these models are used in the daily routine of medical rehabilitation and to what extent the quality (team work) and effectiveness (team success) differ between the models. For the present study an interview guide was designed to assess the team models. In each of the six clinics phone interviews were conducted with one member of the management. Data on teamwork and team success were collected with a staff questionnaire. The questionnaires were distributed to all employees (n = 266; response rate n = 127, 48%) of the six teams. Two teams were classified as interdisciplinary teams and four teams as multidisciplinary. The comparison between the two models shows better results for the interdisciplinary team model. Several methodical restrictions (e. g. unconsidered moderator variables, representativeness of the sample) need to be considered. Systematic analyses of teamwork as presented are essential to identify the conditions of successful teamwork and also form the basis for implementation of team development measures in medical rehabilitation.
多学科或跨学科团队模式常用于描述医学康复中的团队。关于这些模式是否应用于医学康复的日常工作,以及不同模式之间在质量(团队协作)和效果(团队成效)方面存在何种程度的差异,目前仅有很少的证据。在本研究中,设计了一份访谈指南来评估团队模式。在六家诊所中,分别与一名管理人员进行了电话访谈。通过员工问卷收集了有关团队协作和团队成效的数据。问卷分发给了六个团队的所有员工(n = 266;回复率n = 127,48%)。两个团队被归类为跨学科团队,四个团队为多学科团队。两种模式的比较结果显示,跨学科团队模式表现更佳。需要考虑一些方法上的局限性(例如未考虑的调节变量、样本的代表性)。对团队协作进行如此呈现的系统分析对于确定成功团队协作的条件至关重要,也是在医学康复中实施团队发展措施的基础。