Institut für Radiologie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov;268(11):1655-61. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1527-9. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
Our intention was to evaluate whether enlargement of the cochlear aqueduct could play a role in dysfunctions of the inner ear. There is little literature dealing with the question of cochlear aqueduct (CA) enlargement and results of reported radiological examinations are contradictory. Therefore, we decided to analyse 400 high-resolution CT-scans of the temporal bone to examine the diameter of the CA. We used scan-data from a 64-line multislice spiral-CT-scanner stored in our PACS-System. CA-enlargement was defined as a diameter of more than 1 mm in the whole otic capsule portion. A classification with four types of CA's proposed by Migirov and Kronenberg in 2005 was applied. Statistical analysis of diameters, different CA-types and side asymmetry was performed. We did not find any CA exceeding 1 mm in diameter in the otic capsule portion, there is no evidence of CA-enlargement, not even in patients with inner ear malformation. A new aspect compared with published literature to date is that nearly in all cases CA was identified, but in different degrees. According to our findings, it seems to be very unlikely that CA-enlargement is a reason for pathologic inner ear condition as it is in case of large vestibular aqueduct.
我们的目的是评估耳蜗导水管扩大是否在内耳功能障碍中起作用。关于耳蜗导水管(CA)扩大的文献很少,报告的影像学检查结果也相互矛盾。因此,我们决定分析 400 例颞骨高分辨率 CT 扫描,以检查 CA 的直径。我们使用存储在我们的 PACS 系统中的 64 排多层螺旋 CT 扫描仪的扫描数据。CA 扩大定义为整个耳囊部分的直径超过 1 毫米。我们应用了 Migirov 和 Kronenberg 于 2005 年提出的将 CA 分为四型的分类方法。对直径、不同的 CA 类型和侧方不对称性进行了统计学分析。我们没有发现耳囊部分的 CA 直径超过 1 毫米,没有证据表明 CA 扩大,即使在内耳畸形的患者中也没有。与迄今为止已发表的文献相比,一个新的方面是,几乎在所有情况下都可以识别 CA,但程度不同。根据我们的发现,CA 扩大似乎不太可能像大前庭水管那样成为病理性内耳疾病的原因。