• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于 60 岁以下的男性,经腹内镜前列腺癌根治术后行筋膜内内镜腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术,其功能和肿瘤学结果最佳。

Functional and oncological outcomes of men under 60 years of age having endoscopic surgery for prostate cancer are optimal following intrafascial endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2011 Apr;9(2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.005
PMID:21342669
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) is a well-established procedure for treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Intrafascial nerve-sparing EERPE (nsEERPE) aims to preserve the neurovascular bundle and subsequently erectile function. This study assessed the functional and oncological outcomes of nsEERPE with particular regard to younger patients.

METHODS

Data on 353 men undergoing EERPE between February 2006 and December 2009 was collected prospectively. Non-nerve-sparing EERPE was performed in men diagnosed with PCa with a Gleason score >6 and/or PSA >10 μg/l. nsEERPE was undertaken in men diagnosed PCa with PSA ≤10 μg/l and Gleason score ≤6. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as PSA ≥0.2 μg/l after nadir or never reached nadir. Men were deemed continent if dry or using 1 confidence pad. Erections satisfactory for intercourse (ESI) or unsatisfactory for intercourse (EUI) were recorded.

RESULTS

102 Men (29%) had nsEERPE and 126 (36%) EERPE. pT2 positive surgical margin (PSM) rates were 20.5% for nsEERPE and 21.3% for EERPE (P = 1). Continence rates following nsEERPE were 59%, 86%, 97% and 52%, 76%, 86% following EERPE at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up respectively (P > 0.05). Erectile function rates for nsEERPE were 24%, 52%, 71% compared to 6%, 14%, 29% for EERPE at 3, 6 and 12 months respectively (P < 0.001). Erectile function in men <60 y having nsEERPE was 75% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Continence returned more rapidly and erectile function was improved following nsEERPE vs. EERPE. These results suggest that nsEERPE can be performed with particularly good oncological and functional outcome in <60 y men.

摘要

背景

内镜经腹前列腺癌根治术(EERPE)是一种治疗前列腺癌(PCa)的成熟手术。筋膜内保留神经的 EERPE(nsEERPE)旨在保留神经血管束,从而维持勃起功能。本研究特别关注年轻患者,评估了 nsEERPE 的功能和肿瘤学结果。

方法

前瞻性收集了 2006 年 2 月至 2009 年 12 月期间接受 EERPE 的 353 名男性的数据。非神经保留 EERPE 用于诊断为 PCa 且 Gleason 评分>6 和/或 PSA>10μg/l 的男性。nsEERPE 用于诊断为 PSA≤10μg/l 和 Gleason 评分≤6 的 PCa 男性。生化失败(BF)定义为 PSA 在最低值后≥0.2μg/l 或从未达到最低值。如果男性使用 1 片卫生巾时为干燥或轻度潮湿,则认为其具有控尿能力。记录勃起功能是否满意(ESI)或不满意(EUI)进行性交。

结果

102 名男性(29%)接受了 nsEERPE,126 名男性(36%)接受了 EERPE。nsEERPE 的阳性切缘(PSM)率为 20.5%,EERPE 的 PSM 率为 21.3%(P=1)。nsEERPE 后的控尿率分别为 59%、86%、97%,EERPE 分别为 52%、76%、86%,在 3、6 和 12 个月的随访时。nsEERPE 的勃起功能率分别为 24%、52%、71%,EERPE 分别为 6%、14%、29%,在 3、6 和 12 个月的随访时。<60 岁接受 nsEERPE 的男性在 12 个月时勃起功能为 75%。

结论

与 EERPE 相比,nsEERPE 后控尿更快,勃起功能得到改善。这些结果表明,nsEERPE 可以在<60 岁的男性中取得良好的肿瘤学和功能结果。

相似文献

1
Functional and oncological outcomes of men under 60 years of age having endoscopic surgery for prostate cancer are optimal following intrafascial endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.对于 60 岁以下的男性,经腹内镜前列腺癌根治术后行筋膜内内镜腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术,其功能和肿瘤学结果最佳。
Surgeon. 2011 Apr;9(2):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
2
Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.筋膜内保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术
Urology. 2006 Jan;67(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.052.
3
A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.筋膜间和筋膜内神经保留根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较。
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):743-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.089. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
4
Previous laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair does not adversely affect the functional or oncological outcomes of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.先前的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术不会对经腹腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的功能或肿瘤学结果产生不利影响。
Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):963-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.068. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
5
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of prostate: oncologic and functional outcomes of 100 cases.经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后行内镜经腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:100 例的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
6
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): a new approach for treatment of localized prostate cancer.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术(EERPE):一种治疗局限性前列腺癌的新方法。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Oct;89(10):1601-8.
7
Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases.内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术:技术的演变及2400例病例的经验
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1467-72. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0336.
8
Performance and functional outcome of endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in relation to obesity: an assessment of 500 patients.肥胖与内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的手术效果及功能转归:500例患者的评估
BJU Int. 2008 Sep;102(6):718-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07664.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
9
Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy.筋膜内保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术
Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):931-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.11.047. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
10
Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins.保留神经的内镜下腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术——耻骨前列腺韧带保留对早期控尿和切缘阳性的影响
Eur Urol. 2006 Jan;49(1):103-11; discussion 111-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological safety of intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy compared with conventional process: a pooled review and meta-regression analysis based on available studies.筋膜内神经保留根治性前列腺切除术与常规手术的肿瘤安全性比较:基于现有研究的汇总回顾和荟萃回归分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 May 27;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0476-2.
2
Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients' postoperative continence recovery and erectile function: A pooled analysis based on available literatures.筋膜内保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术可改善患者术后控尿恢复及勃起功能:基于现有文献的汇总分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11297. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011297.
3
Comparison of intrafascial and non-intrafascial radical prostatectomy for low risk localized prostate cancer.
筋膜内和非筋膜内根治性前列腺切除术治疗低危局限性前列腺癌的比较。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 14;7(1):17604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17929-3.
4
Prevention and management of post prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的预防与管理
Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Aug;4(4):421-37. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.09.10.
5
A matched-pair comparison between bilateral intrafascial and interfascial nerve-sparing techniques in extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.双侧筋膜内与筋膜间神经保留技术在腹膜外腹腔镜前列腺根治术中的配对比较。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Jul;15(4):513-7. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.157. Epub 2013 May 27.