Suppr超能文献

这位患者可以出院回家吗?癌症患者在家中死亡的相关因素。

Can this patient be discharged home? Factors associated with at-home death among patients with cancer.

机构信息

La Paz University Hospital, Madrid Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1159-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6752. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with at-home death among patients with advanced cancer and create a decision-making model for discharging patients from an acute-care hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study to identify the association between place of death and the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with advanced cancer who received care from a palliative home care team (PHCT) and of their primary caregivers. We used logistic regression analysis to identify the predictors of at-home death.

RESULTS

We identified 380 patients who met the study inclusion criteria; of these, 245 patients (64%) died at home, 72 (19%) died in an acute-care hospital, 60 (16%) died in a palliative care unit, and three (1%) died in a nursing home. Median follow-up was 48 days. We included the 16 variables that were significant in univariate analysis in our decision-making model. Five variables predictive of at-home death were retained in the multivariate analysis: caregiver's preferred place of death, patients' preferred place of death, caregiver's perceived social support, number of hospital admission days, and number of PHCT visits. A subsequent reduced model including only those variables that were known at the time of discharge (caregivers' preferred place of death, patients' preferred place of death, and caregivers' perceived social support) had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 81% in predicting place of death.

CONCLUSION

Asking a few simple patient- and family-centered questions may help to inform the decision regarding the best place for end-of-life care and death.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与晚期癌症患者居家死亡相关的因素,并为从急性护理医院出院的患者创建一个决策模型。

患者和方法

我们进行了一项观察性队列研究,以确定死亡地点与接受姑息家庭护理团队(PHCT)治疗的晚期癌症患者及其主要照顾者的临床和人口统计学特征之间的关联。我们使用逻辑回归分析来确定居家死亡的预测因素。

结果

我们确定了 380 名符合研究纳入标准的患者;其中,245 名(64%)患者在家中死亡,72 名(19%)患者在急性护理医院死亡,60 名(16%)患者在姑息治疗病房死亡,3 名(1%)患者在疗养院死亡。中位随访时间为 48 天。我们将单因素分析中有意义的 16 个变量纳入决策模型。在多变量分析中保留了 5 个可预测居家死亡的变量:照顾者首选的死亡地点、患者首选的死亡地点、照顾者感知的社会支持、住院天数和 PHCT 访问次数。随后的简化模型仅包括出院时已知的变量(照顾者首选的死亡地点、患者首选的死亡地点和照顾者感知的社会支持),在预测死亡地点方面具有 96%的敏感性和 81%的特异性。

结论

询问一些简单的以患者和家庭为中心的问题,可能有助于确定临终关怀和死亡的最佳地点。

相似文献

1
Can this patient be discharged home? Factors associated with at-home death among patients with cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1159-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6752. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
3
[Palliative care for children in onco-hematology: Role of a specific home-care team].
Bull Cancer. 2018 Sep;105(9):771-779. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
6
A Study of the Association Between Multidisciplinary Home Care and Home Death Among Thai Palliative Care Patients.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;34(5):397-403. doi: 10.1177/1049909116631550. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
Prospective Study of Preferred Versus Actual Place of Death Among Swedish Palliative Cancer Patients.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Sep;41(9):969-977. doi: 10.1177/10499091231213640. Epub 2023 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Preferred and Actual Places of Death Among Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Single-centre Cohort Study in Japan.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul-Sep;30(3):268-274. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_133_2024. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
5
Cost-benefit analysis of ALK diagnosis vs. non-diagnosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Spain.
Glob Reg Health Technol Assess. 2022 Sep 12;9:82-90. doi: 10.33393/grhta.2022.2449. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Factors Related to Family Caregivers' Readiness for the Hospital Discharge of Advanced Cancer Patients.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;19(13):8097. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138097.
9
Influence of social isolation and loneliness on the prognosis of advanced lung cancer patients: a prospective cohort study.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6045-6053. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07026-1. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
10
Levels and Determinants of Place-Of-Death Congruence in Palliative Patients: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 13;12:807869. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.807869. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Which patients with cancer die at home? A study of six European countries using death certificate data.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2267-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2850. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
2
Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Mar;39(3):591-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.007. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
3
Public reporting of discharge planning and rates of readmissions.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 31;361(27):2637-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0904859.
4
Death at home unlikely if informal carers prefer otherwise: implications for policy.
Palliat Med. 2008 Dec;22(8):971-2. doi: 10.1177/0269216308098805. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
5
Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions?
Palliat Med. 2008 Oct;22(7):787-95. doi: 10.1177/0269216308092287. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
6
Population-based study of dying in hospital in six European countries.
Palliat Med. 2008 Sep;22(6):702-10. doi: 10.1177/0269216308092285.
7
Effectiveness of specialized palliative care: a systematic review.
JAMA. 2008 Apr 9;299(14):1698-709. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.14.1698.
9
Where people die: a multilevel approach to understanding influences on site of death in America.
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Aug;64(4):351-78. doi: 10.1177/1077558707301810.
10
Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):993-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01234.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验