Department of Geriatric Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Mar;39(3):591-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.007. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
Congruence between preferred and actual place of death may be an essential component in terminal care. Most patients prefer a home death, but many patients do not die in their preferred location. Specialized (physician, hospice, and palliative) home care visits may increase home deaths, but factors associated with congruence have not been systematically reviewed. This study sought to review the extent of congruence reported in the literature and examine factors that may influence congruence. In July 2009, a comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Reference lists, related articles, and the past five years of six palliative care journals were also searched. Overall congruence rates (percentage of met preferences for all locations of death) were calculated for each study using reported data to allow cross-study comparison. Eighteen articles described 30%-91% congruence. Eight specialized home care studies reported 59%-91% congruence. A physician-led home care program reported 91% congruence. Of the 10 studies without specialized home care for all patients, seven reported 56%-71% congruence and most reported unique care programs. Of the remaining three studies without specialized home care for all patients, two reported 43%-46% congruence among hospital inpatients, and one elicited patient preference "if everything were possible," with 30% congruence. Physician support, hospice enrollment, and family support improved congruence in multiple studies. Research in this important area must consider potential sources of bias, the method of eliciting patient preference, and the absence of a single ideal place of death.
在临终关怀中,患者偏好的死亡地点与实际死亡地点的一致性可能是一个重要组成部分。大多数患者希望在家中去世,但许多患者并未在其偏好的地点去世。专门的(医生、临终关怀和姑息治疗)家庭护理访问可能会增加在家中去世的人数,但与一致性相关的因素尚未得到系统审查。本研究旨在综述文献中报告的一致性程度,并探讨可能影响一致性的因素。2009 年 7 月,使用 MEDLINE、PsychInfo、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 进行了全面的文献检索。还查阅了参考文献列表、相关文章以及六份姑息治疗期刊过去五年的内容。使用报告的数据计算了每个研究的总体一致性率(所有死亡地点符合偏好的百分比),以便进行跨研究比较。有 18 篇文章描述了 30%-91%的一致性。8 项专门的家庭护理研究报告了 59%-91%的一致性。一项由医生主导的家庭护理计划报告了 91%的一致性。在 10 项没有为所有患者提供专门家庭护理的研究中,有 7 项报告了 56%-71%的一致性,且大多数报告了独特的护理计划。在其余 3 项没有为所有患者提供专门家庭护理的研究中,有 2 项报告了住院患者的一致性为 43%-46%,有 1 项是在假设“如果一切皆有可能”的情况下征求患者的偏好,一致性为 30%。在多项研究中,医生的支持、临终关怀的参与以及家庭的支持都提高了一致性。在这一重要领域的研究必须考虑潜在的偏倚来源、征求患者偏好的方法以及不存在单一理想的死亡地点。