Suppr超能文献

个体亮度和对比度调整对骨下缺损放射测量准确性的影响。

Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Mar;40(3):177-83. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/56018062.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects and to compare the accuracy with and without individual digital adjustment of brightness and contrast.

METHODS

In 41 periodontitis patients (19 females, 22 males; age range 23-73 years), 50 radiographs of 50 infrabony defects were obtained. All radiographs were digitized. Using a personal computer program, the linear distances between cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar crest (AC) and between CEJ and bony defect (BD), and the depth of the infrabony defect (INFRA), were measured twice, according to the individual judgement of the radiographic examiner: (1) without digital adjustment (W) and (2) after use of contrast and brightness adjustment (A). Intrasurgical bone measurements served as the gold standard. The accuracy of measurements with or without digital adjustment was compared.

RESULTS

Radiographic measurements underestimated the gold standard for CEJ-BD (W: 1.1 mm ± 1.8 mm, P < 0.001; A: 1.0 mm ± 1.9 mm, P = 0.001). Both CEJ-AC (W: 0.2 mm ± 2.5 mm; A: 0.5 mm ± 2.6 mm) and INFRA (W: -0.4 mm ± 2.4 mm; A: -0.6 mm ± 2.5 mm) measurements came close to the gold standard. Statistically significant differences between W and A regarding accuracy were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement tool used in this study provided high-accuracy measurements of periodontal bone loss in INFRA. Individual brightness and contrast adjustment failed to improve accuracy.

摘要

目的

评估影像学测量骨下缺损的准确性,并比较在调整和不调整亮度和对比度个体差异情况下的准确性。

方法

在 41 名牙周炎患者(19 名女性,22 名男性;年龄 23-73 岁)中,拍摄了 50 张骨下缺损的放射照片。所有的放射照片都进行了数字化处理。使用个人计算机程序,根据放射科医生的个人判断,测量两次釉牙骨质界(CEJ)和牙槽嵴(AC)之间以及 CEJ 和骨缺损(BD)之间的线性距离,以及骨下缺损(INFRA)的深度:(1)不进行数字调整(W)和(2)使用对比度和亮度调整(A)后。手术中的骨测量作为金标准。比较了有或没有数字调整的测量准确性。

结果

放射测量值低估了金标准的 CEJ-BD(W:1.1 毫米±1.8 毫米,P < 0.001;A:1.0 毫米±1.9 毫米,P = 0.001)。CEJ-AC(W:0.2 毫米±2.5 毫米;A:0.5 毫米±2.6 毫米)和 INFRA(W:-0.4 毫米±2.4 毫米;A:-0.6 毫米±2.5 毫米)的测量值都接近金标准。在准确性方面,W 和 A 之间没有观察到统计学上显著的差异。

结论

本研究中使用的测量工具对牙周骨丧失的 INFRA 进行了高精度的测量。个体的亮度和对比度调整未能提高准确性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验