Manhattan Psychiatric Center, Psychopharmacology Research Program, New York, NY, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Apr;31(2):160-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31820f4fe0.
Quetiapine is often prescribed at doses higher than those approved by regulatory authorities, with limited evidence from controlled trials. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of high-dose quetiapine (1200 mg/d) compared with a standard dose of 600 mg/d among patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder hospitalized at 2 state-operated psychiatric facilities. In order to be eligible for randomization, subjects were required to prospectively fail to demonstrate an initial therapeutic response during a 4-week run-in phase with quetiapine at 600 mg/d (immediate release and dosed twice a day). Lack of an adequate initial response was defined a 15% or lower decrease in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients were then randomized to either continue quetiapine at 600 mg/d for an additional 8 weeks or to receive 1200 mg/d quetiapine instead. No significant differences were observed between the high dose (n = 29) and standard dose (n = 31) groups in change from baseline to endpoint on extrapyramidal symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, or most laboratory measures between groups. There was a significant difference between groups for triglycerides (P = 0.035), and post hoc tests revealed a decrease in triglycerides from baseline (mean [SD], 162.7 [59.3] mg/dL) to endpoint (mean [SD], 134.8 [62.7] mg/dL) for the 600 mg/d group (P = 0.019). The mean change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score did not differ between groups. In conclusion, quetiapine at 1200 mg/d, although reasonably tolerated, did not confer any advantages over quetiapine at 600 mg/d among patients who had failed to demonstrate an adequate response to a prospective 4-week trial of 600 mg/d.
喹硫平的剂量常高于监管机构批准的剂量,而对照试验的证据有限。本研究的目的是评估高剂量喹硫平(1200mg/d)与 600mg/d 标准剂量相比,在 2 家州立精神病院住院的符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍诊断标准的患者中的安全性、耐受性和疗效。为了有资格接受随机分组,受试者需要在为期 4 周的喹硫平 600mg/d(速释剂,每天两次给药)导入期内前瞻性地表现出无初始治疗反应。无充分初始反应定义为阳性与阴性症状量表总分降低 15%或更低。然后,患者被随机分为继续喹硫平 600mg/d 治疗 8 周,或换用 1200mg/d 喹硫平。高剂量组(n=29)和标准剂量组(n=31)之间在从基线到终点的锥体外系症状、心电图变化或大多数实验室指标方面均无显著差异。两组之间在甘油三酯方面存在显著差异(P=0.035),事后检验显示 600mg/d 组的甘油三酯从基线(平均[标准差],162.7[59.3]mg/dL)到终点(平均[标准差],134.8[62.7]mg/dL)下降(P=0.019)。阳性与阴性症状量表总分的平均变化在两组之间无差异。总之,在未能对 600mg/d 的前瞻性 4 周试验表现出充分反应的患者中,1200mg/d 的喹硫平虽然可合理耐受,但并未比 600mg/d 的喹硫平带来任何优势。