• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理与技术转让:患者、专利与公众信任

Ethics and technology transfer: patients, patents, and public trust.

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

J Investig Med. 2011 Jun;59(5):762-7. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318210eeb0.

DOI:10.2310/JIM.0b013e318210eeb0
PMID:21346627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3703588/
Abstract

Universities and academic medical centers have been increasing their focus on technology transfer and research commercialization. With this shift in focus, academic-industry ties have become prevalent. These relationships can benefit academic researchers and help then to transform their research into tangible societal benefits. However, there also are concerns that these ties and the greater academic focus on commercialization might lead to conflicts of interest, especially financial conflicts of interest. This paper briefly explores some of these conflicts of interest, particularly relating to research and training. This paper also discusses some of the policies that have been, and are being, developed to try to mitigate and manage these conflicts so that academic involvement in technology transfer and commercialization can continue without jeopardizing academic work or the public's trust in them.

摘要

大学和学术医疗中心越来越重视技术转移和研究商业化。随着关注焦点的转移,学术界与工业界的联系变得普遍起来。这些关系可以使学术研究人员受益,并帮助他们将研究转化为切实的社会效益。然而,人们也担心这些联系以及学术界对商业化的日益关注可能会导致利益冲突,尤其是财务利益冲突。本文简要探讨了其中一些利益冲突,特别是与研究和培训有关的利益冲突。本文还讨论了一些已经制定和正在制定的政策,以试图减轻和管理这些冲突,从而使大学参与技术转移和商业化的活动能够继续进行,而不会危及学术工作或公众对它们的信任。

相似文献

1
Ethics and technology transfer: patients, patents, and public trust.伦理与技术转让:患者、专利与公众信任
J Investig Med. 2011 Jun;59(5):762-7. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318210eeb0.
2
Policies on faculty conflicts of interest at US universities.美国大学关于教师利益冲突的政策。
JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2203-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.17.2203.
3
Industry-sponsored research.行业资助的研究。
Injury. 2008 Jun;39(6):666-80. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.02.013.
4
Ten steps to developing a national agenda to address financial conflicts of interest in industry sponsored clinical research.制定国家议程以解决行业资助临床研究中经济利益冲突的十个步骤。
Account Res. 2005 Apr-Jun;12(2):139-55. doi: 10.1080/08989620590957229.
5
Research accountability and financial conflicts of interest in industry-sponsored clinical research: a review.行业资助的临床研究中的研究责任与财务利益冲突:一项综述
Account Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;10(3):137-58. doi: 10.1080/714906093.
6
Temporary insanity?暂时精神错乱?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005;6(2):181-4. doi: 10.1089/sur.2005.6.181.
7
Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review.学术与临床研究人员对研究中经济利益关系的态度:一项系统综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Oct;11(4):553-73. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0026-z.
8
Science on trial: conflicts of interest jeopardize scientific integrity and public health.受审的科学:利益冲突危及科学诚信与公众健康。
Genewatch. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):3-6.
9
Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants.学术医疗中心向潜在研究参与者披露经济利益冲突的政策。
Acad Med. 2006 Feb;81(2):113-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00003.
10
Financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: the need to improve the system.生物医学研究中的经济利益冲突:改进体系的必要性。
Drug News Perspect. 2010 Nov;23(9):607-12. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.9.1521763.

引用本文的文献

1
Technology Transfer: From the Research Bench to Commercialization: Part 2: The Commercialization Process.技术转移:从研究台到商业化:第二部分:商业化过程
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2017 Apr 24;2(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.03.004. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
The Effect of Product Safety Courses on the Adoption and Outcomes of LESS Surgery.产品安全课程对单孔腹腔镜手术采用情况及手术结果的影响
JSLS. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00007.

本文引用的文献

1
Disclosing industry relationships--toward an improved federal research policy.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 12;363(7):604-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006973. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
2
Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians.在评估医学文献时未能对利益冲突进行折扣处理:对医生的一项随机试验。
J Med Ethics. 2010 May;36(5):265-70. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.034496.
3
Participation of academic scientists in relationships with industry.学术科学家参与产业关系。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):1814-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.1814.
4
Life-science research within US academic medical centers.美国学术医疗中心内的生命科学研究。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 2;302(9):969-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1265.
5
Discrepancy between results and abstract conclusions in industry- vs nonindustry-funded studies comparing topical prostaglandins.在比较局部用前列腺素的行业资助与非行业资助研究中,结果与摘要结论之间的差异。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;147(1):33-38.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
6
How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: causal structures and responses.制药行业的资金如何影响试验结果:因果结构与应对措施。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 May;66(9):1909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.010. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
7
Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study.荟萃分析中经济利益关系以及结果与结论之间的一致性:回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2007 Dec 8;335(7631):1202-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39376.447211.BE. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
8
Institutional academic industry relationships.机构的学术与行业关系。
JAMA. 2007 Oct 17;298(15):1779-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.15.1779.
9
Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry.机构审查委员会成员与行业之间的财务关系。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 30;355(22):2321-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa061457.
10
Academic freedom and academic-industry relationships in biotechnology.生物技术领域的学术自由与学术-产业关系
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Jun;16(2):129-49. doi: 10.1353/ken.2006.0013.