• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过NDF-RT药物类别实现RxNorm的分层视图。

Enabling Hierarchical View of RxNorm with NDF-RT Drug Classes.

作者信息

Palchuk Matvey B, Klumpenaar Michael, Jatkar Tarang, Zottola Ralph J, Adams William G, Abend Aaron H

机构信息

Recombinant Data Corp., Newton, MA;

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:577-81.

PMID:21347044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3041416/
Abstract

NDF-RT is the proposed source of drug classification information. We set out to construct a hierarchy of NDF-RT drug classes and RxNorm medications and evaluate it on medication records data. NDF-RT and RxNorm are distributed in different file formats, require different tools to manipulate and linking the two into a hierarchy is a non-trivial exercise. Medication data in RxNorm from two institutions was constrained by the hierarchy. Only 37% of records from one and 65% from another institution were accessible. We subsequently enriched the RxNorm mapping in NDF-RT by exploiting relationships between concepts for branded and generic drugs. Coverage improved dramatically to 93% for both institutions. To improve usability of the resulting hierarchy, we grouped clinical drugs by corresponding clinical drug form.

摘要

NDF-RT是拟议的药物分类信息来源。我们着手构建NDF-RT药物类别和RxNorm药物的层次结构,并在用药记录数据上对其进行评估。NDF-RT和RxNorm以不同的文件格式分发,需要不同的工具来操作,并且将两者链接成一个层次结构并非易事。来自两个机构的RxNorm中的用药数据受到该层次结构的限制。一个机构只有37%的记录以及另一个机构65%的记录可访问。随后,我们通过利用品牌药和仿制药概念之间的关系丰富了NDF-RT中的RxNorm映射。两个机构的覆盖率都大幅提高到了93%。为了提高所得层次结构的可用性,我们按相应的临床药物剂型对临床药物进行了分组。

相似文献

1
Enabling Hierarchical View of RxNorm with NDF-RT Drug Classes.通过NDF-RT药物类别实现RxNorm的分层视图。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:577-81.
2
Analyzing categorical information in two publicly available drug terminologies: RxNorm and NDF-RT.分析两个公开可用的药物术语集(RxNorm 和 NDF-RT)中的分类信息。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):432-9. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001289.
3
Use of standard drug vocabularies in clinical research: a case study in pediatrics.标准药物词汇在临床研究中的应用:儿科案例研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:607-11.
4
Using RxNorm and NDF-RT to classify medication data extracted from electronic health records: experiences from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.使用RxNorm和NDF-RT对从电子健康记录中提取的用药数据进行分类:罗切斯特流行病学项目的经验
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:1089-98. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
5
Profiling structured product labeling with NDF-RT and RxNorm.使用NDF-RT和RxNorm分析结构化产品标签
J Biomed Semantics. 2012 Dec 20;3(1):16. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-3-16.
6
Enabling complex queries to drug information sources through functional composition.通过功能组合实现对药物信息源的复杂查询。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:692-6.
7
Standardized drug and pharmacological class network construction.标准化药物与药理类别网络构建
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1125.
8
Normalized names for clinical drugs: RxNorm at 6 years.临床药物的规范化名称:RxNorm 六年发展
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):441-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000116. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
9
A High-Fidelity Combined ATC-Rxnorm Drug Hierarchy for Large-Scale Observational Research.高保真的 ATC-Rxnorm 药物层级结构,适用于大规模观察性研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:53-57. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230926.
10
VA National Drug File Reference Terminology: a cross-institutional content coverage study.退伍军人事务部国家药品档案参考术语:一项跨机构内容覆盖研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):477-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward a normalized clinical drug knowledge base in China-applying the RxNorm model to Chinese clinical drugs.迈向中国规范化临床药物知识库——应用 RxNorm 模型于中国临床药物。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jul 1;25(7):809-818. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy020.
2
Lumbar Spine Surgeries and Medication Usage During Hospital Stay: One-Center Perspective.腰椎手术及住院期间药物使用情况:单中心视角
Hosp Pharm. 2017 Dec;52(11):774-780. doi: 10.1177/0018578717737431. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
3
Towards a Consistent and Scientifically Accurate Drug Ontology.迈向一致且科学准确的药物本体论。
CEUR Workshop Proc. 2013;1060:68-73.
4
A numerical similarity approach for using retired Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for electronic phenotyping in the Scalable Collaborative Infrastructure for a Learning Health System (SCILHS).一种在学习健康系统的可扩展协作基础设施(SCILHS)中使用退役现行程序术语(CPT)代码进行电子表型分析的数值相似性方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Dec 11;15:104. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0223-x.
5
Evaluation of RxNorm for Medication Clinical Decision Support.用于药物临床决策支持的RxNorm评估。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:554-63. eCollection 2014.
6
Use of RxNorm and NDF-RT to normalize and characterize participant-reported medications in an i2b2-based research repository.在基于i2b2的研究知识库中使用RxNorm和NDF-RT对参与者报告的药物进行标准化和特征描述。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2014 Apr 7;2014:35-40. eCollection 2014.
7
Standardizing adverse drug event reporting data.规范药品不良事件报告数据。
J Biomed Semantics. 2014 Aug 12;5:36. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-5-36. eCollection 2014.
8
Building a drug ontology based on RxNorm and other sources.基于RxNorm及其他来源构建药物本体。
J Biomed Semantics. 2013 Dec 18;4(1):44. doi: 10.1186/2041-1480-4-44.
9
SHRINE: enabling nationally scalable multi-site disease studies.SHRINE:实现全国范围内可扩展的多站点疾病研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e55811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055811. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
10
Evaluating standard terminologies for encoding allergy information.评估用于编码过敏信息的标准术语。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):969-79. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000816. Epub 2013 Feb 9.

本文引用的文献

1
STRIDE--An integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform.STRIDE——一个基于标准的综合转化研究信息学平台。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:391-5.
2
Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2).以整合生物学与床边护理的信息学服务企业及其他领域 (i2b2)。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):124-30. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000893.
3
Developing data content specifications for the nationwide health information network trial implementations.制定全国卫生信息网试验实施的数据内容规范。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):6-12. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3282.
4
US biomedical research: basic, translational, and clinical sciences.美国生物医学研究:基础、转化和临床科学。
JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1352-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.11.1352.
5
Modeling a description logic vocabulary for cancer research.为癌症研究构建描述逻辑词汇表。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Apr;38(2):114-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.09.001.
6
Phase II evaluation of clinical coding schemes: completeness, taxonomy, mapping, definitions, and clarity. CPRI Work Group on Codes and Structures.临床编码方案的II期评估:完整性、分类法、映射、定义及清晰度。CPRI代码与结构工作组
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 May-Jun;4(3):238-51. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040238.