• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

躯体变形障碍患者的概率推理。

Probabilistic reasoning in patients with body dysmorphic disorder.

机构信息

Harvard University, Department of Psychology, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;42(3):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.11.005
PMID:21349243
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Many patients with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have poor insight into their condition. Indeed, their conviction in their ugliness is often delusional. Perhaps the most robust information-processing abnormality associated with delusions is a jumping to conclusions (JTC) reasoning bias such that delusional individuals request significantly less information before making a decision relative to healthy controls. We investigated whether patients with BDD (n = 20) demonstrate a JTC reasoning style relative to patients with OCD (n = 20) and healthy controls (n = 20).

METHODS

Participants completed a clinician-rated measure of delusionality and two tests of probabilistic reasoning: the beads task and the survey task.

RESULTS

Patients with BDD did exhibit higher delusionality than the patients with OCD. They did not, however, exhibit a JTC reasoning bias relative to the patients with OCD or the healthy controls. Patients with poor insight BDD requested significantly less information before making a decision than did patients with fair insight BDD.

LIMITATIONS

The clinical groups were characterized by multiple comorbidities and concomitant medications. The BDD group had relatively good insight as compared to other studies examining delusionality in BDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our results suggest that although a JTC reasoning bias was not present in all patients with BDD, a modest JTC reasoning bias may be present among patients with poor insight BDD. Future studies could provide additional information on this hypothesis.

摘要

背景和目的

许多躯体变形障碍(BDD)患者对自己的病情缺乏洞察力。事实上,他们对自己的丑陋的坚信往往是妄想。也许与妄想最相关的信息处理异常是仓促下结论(JTC)的推理偏差,即妄想患者在做出决定之前,相对健康对照组,要求的信息量明显减少。我们调查了 BDD 患者(n=20)是否相对于 OCD 患者(n=20)和健康对照组(n=20)表现出 JTC 推理风格。

方法

参与者完成了一项临床评定的妄想量表和两项概率推理测试:珠子任务和调查任务。

结果

BDD 患者的妄想程度明显高于 OCD 患者,但与 OCD 患者或健康对照组相比,他们并没有表现出 JTC 推理偏差。洞察力差的 BDD 患者在做出决定前要求的信息量明显少于洞察力好的 BDD 患者。

局限性

临床组的特点是多种合并症和同时服用的药物。与其他研究相比,BDD 组的洞察力相对较好,这些研究检查了 BDD 中的妄想。

结论

综上所述,我们的结果表明,尽管并非所有 BDD 患者都存在 JTC 推理偏差,但洞察力差的 BDD 患者可能存在适度的 JTC 推理偏差。未来的研究可以为这一假说提供更多信息。

相似文献

1
Probabilistic reasoning in patients with body dysmorphic disorder.躯体变形障碍患者的概率推理。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;42(3):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
2
Reality monitoring in patients with body dysmorphic disorder.体变形障碍患者的现实监控。
Behav Ther. 2011 Sep;42(3):387-98. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.10.001. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
3
Body image disturbance in body dysmorphic disorder and eating disorders. Obsessions or delusions?躯体变形障碍和饮食失调中的身体意象障碍。强迫观念还是妄想?
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1995 Jun;18(2):317-34.
4
An examination of delusional thinking and cognitive styles in body dysmorphic disorder.审视躯体变形障碍中的妄想思维和认知风格。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;44(8):706-12. doi: 10.3109/00048671003671007.
5
Degree connectivity in body dysmorphic disorder and relationships with obsessive and compulsive symptoms.身体变形障碍中的程度连通性及其与强迫症状的关系。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 Oct;26(10):1657-66. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
[Body dysmorphic disorder].[躯体变形障碍]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2010 Jul;78(7):394-401. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245492. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
7
Facial asymmetry detection in patients with body dysmorphic disorder.躯体变形障碍患者的面部不对称检测。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Sep;48(9):936-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.021. Epub 2010 May 27.
8
[...with psychotic features? An investigation into the delusional nature of convictions in patients with non-psychotic disorders].[……伴有精神病性特征?对非精神病性障碍患者定罪妄想本质的调查]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2006;48(6):461-6.
9
Reasoning bias and belief conviction in obsessive-compulsive disorder and delusions: jumping to conclusions across disorders?强迫障碍和妄想中推理偏差和信念固执:跨障碍跳跃结论?
Br J Clin Psychol. 2012 Mar;51(1):84-99. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02014.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
10
Insight in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) relative to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and psychotic disorders: Revisiting this issue in light of DSM-5.关于躯体变形障碍(BDD)与强迫症(OCD)及精神障碍的见解:根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)重新审视此问题。
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;77:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of neurocognition and social cognition in body dysmorphic disorder.躯体变形障碍中神经认知与社会认知的系统评价
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;59(3):224-247. doi: 10.1177/00048674241309747. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
Feeling uncertain despite knowing the risk: Patients with OCD (but not controls) experience known and unknown probabilistic decisions as similarly distressing and uncertain.尽管知道风险仍感到不确定:强迫症患者(而非对照组)在面对已知和未知的概率决策时,会同样感到痛苦和不确定。
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2023 Oct;39. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100842. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
3
Accumulation of evidence during decision making in OCD patients.
强迫症患者决策过程中的证据积累。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 23;13:980905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.980905. eCollection 2022.
4
Problems in measuring the JTC-bias in patients with psychotic disorders with the fish task: a secondary analysis of a baseline assessment of a randomized controlled trial.在使用鱼类任务评估精神病患者 JTC 偏倚时存在的问题:一项随机对照试验基线评估的二次分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02959-5.
5
Avoid jumping to conclusions under uncertainty in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.在不确定的情况下避免草率下结论。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0225970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225970. eCollection 2020.
6
Think twice: Impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder.三思而后行:强迫症中的冲动性与决策制定
J Behav Addict. 2015 Dec;4(4):263-72. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.039.
7
Psychosis, Delusions and the "Jumping to Conclusions" Reasoning Bias: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.精神病、妄想与“急于下结论”的推理偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):652-65. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv150. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
8
Comorbidity between obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: prevalence, explanatory theories, and clinical characterization.强迫症与躯体变形障碍的共病:患病率、解释理论及临床特征
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Aug 26;11:2233-44. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S67636. eCollection 2015.
9
Comparison of visual perceptual organization in schizophrenia and body dysmorphic disorder.精神分裂症与躯体变形障碍的视觉感知组织比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Sep 30;229(1-2):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.107. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
10
Data Gathering Bias: Trait Vulnerability to Psychotic Symptoms?数据收集偏差:对精神病症状的特质易感性?
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132442. eCollection 2015.