Suppr超能文献

首发精神病的洞见:谁在测量什么?

Insight in first episode psychosis: who is measuring what?

机构信息

Douglas Hospital Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;2(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2007.00054.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To compare different self-administered or clinician-rated insight scales in an FEP population.

METHODS

A self-administered measure (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale - BCIS) and clinician-rated scales (Scale of Unawareness of Mental Disorder - SUMD and Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale - PANSS-G12 insight item) were completed by 38 patients with a diagnosis of FEP.

RESULTS

The scales had good internal consistency and only the clinician-rated scales were intercorrelated (SUMD - awareness of mental disorder and PANSS-G12 items (r=0.657, P<0.001)). Moreover, we observed a significant association of SUMD and PANSS positive and general subscales and a trend association for BCIS and PANSS negative subscale.

CONCLUSION

Differential associations observed between insight and symptoms may suggest different clinical predictive values for each measure. Our results suggest the necessity to qualify the term 'insight' when discussing research results, most notably with respect to who is rating and what aspect of insight is being rated.

摘要

目的

比较首发精神分裂症患者中不同的自我评估或临床医生评估的洞察力量表。

方法

38 名首发精神分裂症患者完成了自我评估量表(贝克认知洞察力量表-BCIS)和临床医生评估量表(精神障碍觉察量表-SUMD 和阳性和阴性症状量表-PANSS-G12 洞察力项目)。

结果

这些量表具有良好的内部一致性,只有临床医生评估的量表相互关联(SUMD-精神障碍觉察和 PANSS-G12 项目(r=0.657,P<0.001))。此外,我们观察到 SUMD 和 PANSS 阳性和一般分量表与洞察力之间存在显著关联,而 BCIS 和 PANSS 阴性分量表则存在趋势关联。

结论

洞察力和症状之间观察到的不同关联可能表明每种测量方法具有不同的临床预测价值。我们的结果表明,在讨论研究结果时,有必要对“洞察力”一词进行限定,尤其是在评估者是谁以及评估的洞察力的哪个方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验