Suppr超能文献

修订后的 ALT 和 HBV DNA 水平临界值可更好地区分 HBeAg(-)慢性非活动性 HBV 患者与活跃携带者。

Revised cutoff values of ALT and HBV DNA level can better differentiate HBeAg (-) chronic inactive HBV patients from active carriers.

机构信息

Applied and Functional Genomics lab, Centre of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

出版信息

Virol J. 2011 Feb 27;8:86. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-86.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

ELISA is still used as primary test for diagnosis HBV disease. However, ELISA-positive patients were marked as HBV inactive after confirmation with PCR and vice versa. Our aim was to assess the performance of new cut-off value of ALT, HBV DNA load and significance of AST as screening tool for HBeAg (-) chronic active or inactive patients in Pakistani population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cross-sectional, cohort study, 567 HBeAg (-) patients followed for one year were selected. Patients with persistent elevated ALT than normal and HBV DNA ≥ 100,000 copies/mL were taken as active chronic. Diagnostic values for ALT, AST and HBV DNA load in HBV HBeAg (-) chronic active and inactive patients compared using receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Of 567 HBeAg (-) patients, 228 were classified as chronic inactive and 339 as active. HBV infection was dominant in male. Serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA levels showed significant and high AUROC to differentiate chronic HBeAg (-) inactive patients from active. AUROC for Serum ALT, AST and HBV DNA were observed 0.997, 0.969 and 1.000, respectively. For revised cut off value for ALT (30 IU/L for male and 19 IU/L for female) and HBV DNA load ≥100,000 copies/mL, a PPV of 97%, NPV of 94%, a sensitivity of 98%, and a specificity of 92% was observed to discriminate active carriers from inactive carriers. We also observed 93.5% specificity, 83.1% sensitivity, 82% PPV and 89.5% NPV for AST ≤20 IU/L to differentiate inactive carriers from active ones in our study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Revised cut off value of ALT and NIH derived HBV DNA value can better discriminate between HBeAg (-) chronic active and inactive patients.

摘要

背景和目的

ELISA 仍然被用作乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)疾病诊断的主要检测方法。然而,经聚合酶链反应(PCR)确认后,ELISA 阳性患者被标记为 HBV 不活跃,反之亦然。我们的目的是评估新的 ALT、HBV DNA 载量和 AST 临界值在巴基斯坦人群中作为 HBeAg(-)慢性活动或不活跃患者筛查工具的性能。

材料和方法

在一项横断面、队列研究中,选择了 567 名 HBeAg(-)患者进行为期一年的随访。将持续高于正常 ALT 水平且 HBV DNA≥100,000 拷贝/ml 的患者视为慢性活动。使用接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线比较 ALT、AST 和 HBV DNA 载量在 HBV HBeAg(-)慢性活动和不活跃患者中的诊断价值。

结果

在 567 名 HBeAg(-)患者中,228 名患者被归类为慢性不活跃,339 名患者为慢性活动。HBV 感染在男性中更为普遍。血清 ALT、AST 和 HBV DNA 水平对区分慢性 HBeAg(-)不活跃和活动患者具有显著和较高的 AUROC。血清 ALT、AST 和 HBV DNA 的 AUROC 分别为 0.997、0.969 和 1.000。对于 ALT(男性 30IU/L,女性 19IU/L)和 HBV DNA 载量≥100,000 拷贝/ml 的修订临界值,观察到阳性预测值(PPV)为 97%、阴性预测值(NPV)为 94%、敏感性为 98%、特异性为 92%,可用于区分活动携带者和不活跃携带者。在我们的研究组中,我们还观察到 AST≤20IU/L 对区分不活跃携带者和活动携带者的特异性为 93.5%、敏感性为 83.1%、PPV 为 82%、NPV 为 89.5%。

结论

修订的 ALT 和 NIH 衍生的 HBV DNA 值的临界值可以更好地区分 HBeAg(-)慢性活动和不活跃患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e68/3052190/444615e8c4b2/1743-422X-8-86-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验