Länkimäki Sami, Alahuhta Seppo, Silfvast Tom, Kurola Jouni
Helsinki Area Helicopter Emergency Medical Service, Helsinki University Central Hospital, FI-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Länsi-Pohja Healthcare District, Kauppakatu 25, FI-94100, Kemi, Finland.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Feb 26;23:24. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0105-3.
Airway management to ensure sufficient gas exchange is of major importance in emergency care. The accepted basic technique is to maintain an open airway and perform artificial ventilation in emergency situations is bag-valve mask (BVM) ventilation with manual airway management without airway adjuncts or with an oropharyngeal tube (OPA) only. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is often referred to as the golden standard of airway management, but is associated with low success rates and significant insertion-related complications when performed by non-anaesthetists. Supraglottic devices (SADs) are one alternative to ETI in these situations, but there is limited evidence regarding the use of SAD in non-cardiac arrest situations. LMA Supreme (LMA-S) is a new SAD which theoretically has an advantage concerning the risk of aspiration due to an oesophageal inlet gastric tube port.
Forty paramedics were recruited to participate in the study. Adult (>18 years) patients, unconscious due to medical or traumatic cause with a GCS score corresponding to 3-5 and needed airway management were included in the study. Our aim was to study the feasibility of LMA-S as a primary airway method in unconscious patients by advanced life support (ALS) trained paramedics in prehospital care.
Three regional Emergency Medical Service (EMS) services participated and 21 patients were treated during the survey. The LMA-S was placed correctly on the first attempt in all instances 21/21 (100%), with a median time to first ventilation of 9.8 s. Paramedics evaluated the insertion to be easy in every case 21/21 (100%). Because of air leak later in the patient care, the LMA-S was exchanged to an LT-D in two cases and to ETI in three cases (23.81%) by the paramedics. Regurgitation occurred after insertion two times out of 21 (9.52%) and in one of these cases (4.76%), paramedics reported regurgitation inside the LMA-S.
We conclude that the LMA-S seems to be relatively easy and quick to insert in unconscious patients by paramedics. However, we found out that there were ventilation related problems with the LMA-S. Further studies are warranted.
在急救护理中,确保充足气体交换的气道管理至关重要。公认的基本技术是在紧急情况下保持气道通畅并进行人工通气,即使用袋阀面罩(BVM)通气并进行手动气道管理,不使用气道辅助装置或仅使用口咽通气管(OPA)。气管插管(ETI)常被称为气道管理的金标准,但由非麻醉医生操作时成功率较低且存在与插入相关的严重并发症。在这些情况下,声门上装置(SADs)是ETI的一种替代方法,但关于SADs在非心脏骤停情况下的使用证据有限。LMA Supreme(LMA-S)是一种新型SAD,理论上由于其食管入口胃管端口,在误吸风险方面具有优势。
招募了40名护理人员参与该研究。纳入研究的患者为成年(>18岁),因医疗或创伤原因导致昏迷,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为3 - 5分且需要气道管理。我们的目的是研究在院前护理中,经过高级生命支持(ALS)培训的护理人员将LMA-S作为昏迷患者主要气道管理方法的可行性。
三个地区的紧急医疗服务(EMS)机构参与了研究,调查期间共治疗了21例患者。在所有情况下,LMA-S均在首次尝试时正确放置,成功率为21/21(100%),首次通气的中位时间为9.8秒。护理人员评估每次插入都很容易,成功率为21/21(100%)。由于在患者护理后期出现漏气,护理人员将两例患者的LMA-S更换为喉罩导管(LT-D),三例患者更换为气管插管(ETI)(23.81%)。21例患者中有2例(9.52%)在插入后发生反流,其中1例(4.76%)护理人员报告反流发生在LMA-S内部。
我们得出结论,护理人员在昏迷患者中插入LMA-S似乎相对容易且迅速。然而,我们发现LMA-S存在与通气相关的问题。有必要进行进一步研究。