Suppr超能文献

药物辅助高级气道管理,一线使用声门上装置-一年质量保证审查。

Medication-Facilitated Advanced Airway Management with First-Line Use of a Supraglottic Device - A One-Year Quality Assurance Review.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FloridaUSA.

出版信息

Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Aug;37(4):561-565. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000802. Epub 2022 May 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Airway management is a controversial topic in modern Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems. Among many concerns regarding endotracheal intubation (ETI), unrecognized esophageal intubation and observations of unfavorable neurologic outcomes in some studies raise the question of whether alternative airway techniques should be first-line in EMS airway management protocols. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are simpler to use, provide reliable oxygenation and ventilation, and may thus be an alternative first-line airway device for paramedics. In 2019, Alachua County Fire Rescue (ACFR; Alachua, Florida USA) introduced a novel protocol for advanced airway management emphasizing first-line use of a second-generation SAD (i-gel) for patients requiring medication-facilitated airway management (referred to as "rapid sequence airway" [RSA] protocol).

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This was a one-year quality assurance review of care provided under the RSA protocol looking at compliance and first-pass success rate of first-line SAD use.

METHODS

Records were obtained from the agency's electronic medical record (EMR), searching for the use of the RSA protocol, advanced airway devices, or either ketamine or rocuronium. If available, hospital follow-up data regarding patient condition and emergency department (ED) airway exchange were obtained.

RESULTS

During the first year, 33 advanced airway attempts were made under the protocol by 23 paramedics. Overall, compliance with the airway device sequence as specified in the protocol was 72.7%. When ETI was non-compliantly used as first-line airway device, the first-pass success rate was 44.4% compared to 87.5% with adherence to first-line SAD use. All prehospital SADs were exchanged in the ED in a delayed fashion and almost exclusively per physician preference alone. In no case was the SAD exchanged for suspected dislodgement evidenced by lack of capnography.

CONCLUSION

First-line use of a SAD was associated with a high first-pass attempt success rate in a real-life cohort of prehospital advanced airway encounters. No SAD required emergent exchange upon hospital arrival.

摘要

简介

气道管理是现代急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中的一个有争议的话题。在许多关于气管插管(ETI)的问题中,一些研究中未被识别的食管插管和不良神经结局的观察结果提出了这样一个问题,即替代气道技术是否应该成为 EMS 气道管理协议中的一线治疗方法。声门上气道装置(SAD)使用起来更简单,能提供可靠的氧合和通气,因此可能是急救人员的一种替代一线气道装置。2019 年,美国佛罗里达州阿拉楚阿县消防救援局(ACFR)推出了一项新的高级气道管理协议,强调一线使用第二代 SAD(i-gel)治疗需要药物辅助气道管理的患者(称为“快速序贯气道”[RSA]协议)。

研究目的

这是对根据 RSA 协议提供的护理进行的为期一年的质量保证审查,旨在观察一线 SAD 使用的依从性和首次通过成功率。

方法

从机构的电子病历(EMR)中获取记录,搜索 RSA 协议、高级气道装置或氯胺酮或罗库溴铵的使用情况。如果有可用的患者情况和急诊部(ED)气道交换的医院随访数据,则获取相关数据。

结果

在第一年,23 名急救人员根据协议进行了 33 次高级气道尝试。总体而言,根据协议规定的气道装置顺序的依从率为 72.7%。当 ETI 被不恰当地用作一线气道装置时,首次通过成功率为 44.4%,而遵守一线 SAD 使用的首次通过成功率为 87.5%。所有院前 SAD 都在 ED 中以延迟方式进行交换,几乎完全是根据医生的偏好单独进行的。在任何情况下,SAD 都没有因缺乏二氧化碳描记术而被怀疑移位而紧急更换。

结论

在现实生活中的院前高级气道遇到的情况下,一线使用 SAD 与高首次通过尝试成功率相关。没有 SAD 需要在到达医院时紧急更换。

相似文献

1
Medication-Facilitated Advanced Airway Management with First-Line Use of a Supraglottic Device - A One-Year Quality Assurance Review.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Aug;37(4):561-565. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000802. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Impact of System-Wide King LT Airway Implementation on Orotracheal Intubation.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Sep-Oct;20(5):570-7. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1163446. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Feasibility of LMA Supreme for airway management in unconscious patients by ALS paramedics.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Feb 26;23:24. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0105-3.
5
Unrecognized failed airway management using a supraglottic airway device.
Resuscitation. 2017 Oct;119:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
6
Prehospital Airway Management Examined at Two Pediatric Emergency Centers.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Oct;33(5):532-538. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000882.
8
Advanced airway management success rates in a national cohort of emergency medical services agencies.
Resuscitation. 2020 Jan 1;146:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Emergency airway management in trauma patients using laryngeal tube suction.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):347-50. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561405. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
10
Prehospital Drug Assisted Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(sup1):42-53. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1990447.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety considerations and risk mitigation strategies for ketamine use: a comprehensive review.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 2;87(5):2829-2837. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003232. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Prehospital Airway Management: A Systematic Review.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Sep-Oct;26(5):716-727. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1940400. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Brief Research Report: Prehospital Rapid Sequence Airway.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Jul-Aug;25(4):583-587. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1792015. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Alternatives to Rapid Sequence Intubation: Contemporary Airway Management with Ketamine.
West J Emerg Med. 2019 May;20(3):466-471. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.4.42753. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
7
Pre-hospital i-gel blind intubation for trauma: a simulation study.
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 30;5(1):29-34. doi: 10.15441/ceem.16.188. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Prehospital endotracheal intubation: elemental or detrimental?
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 16;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0808-x.
9
Delayed sequence intubation: a prospective observational study.
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.09.025. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验