• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过具有多种奖励的大规模任务分析威廉姆斯综合征的探索功能。

Explorative function in Williams syndrome analyzed through a large-scale task with multiple rewards.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University Sapienza of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):972-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.001
PMID:21353462
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate spatial function in subjects with Williams syndrome (WS) by using a large-scale task with multiple rewards and comparing the spatial abilities of WS subjects with those of mental age-matched control children. In the present spatial task, WS participants had to explore an open space to search nine rewards placed in buckets arranged according to three spatial configurations: a cross, a 3 × 3 matrix and a cluster composed by three groups of three buckets each. The findings demonstrate that WS individuals were impaired in efficiently exploring the environment and in building cognitive spatial maps. In exploring the three spatial configurations, they performed worse than control subjects on all parameters analyzed. In fact, WS individuals took more time to complete the task, made more errors, performed a reduced number of error-free trials, displayed lower search efficiency, exhibited shorter spatial spans, showed a higher number of no-visits and displayed marked tendencies to perseverate and to neglect some buckets. Furthermore, WS individuals showed disorganized explorative patterns in comparison to control children. WS influenced performances differentially as a specific effect of the susceptibility of the configurations to being explored in a principled way. In the cross configuration that had strong spatial constraints, both groups exhibited their worst performances. In the matrix configuration, the altered explorative strategies of the WS subjects primarily affected their central exploration. The performances in the cluster configuration indicated that chunking was a strategy of strength in both TD and WS groups. In conclusion, WS individuals' deficits exhibited in the present explorative test may be considered an index of their difficulties in spatial orientation and motion perception displayed in the real world. The marked impairment in spatial information processing is discussed in neuro-anatomical alterations reported in WS.

摘要

本研究旨在通过使用具有多种奖励的大规模任务来评估威廉姆斯综合征(WS)患者的空间功能,并将 WS 患者的空间能力与同龄心理匹配的对照组儿童进行比较。在目前的空间任务中,WS 参与者必须探索一个开放空间,以搜索放置在根据三个空间配置排列的桶中的九个奖励:十字形、3x3 矩阵和由三组每组三个桶组成的集群。研究结果表明,WS 个体在有效地探索环境和构建认知空间地图方面存在障碍。在探索这三种空间配置时,他们在所有分析的参数上都比对照组表现更差。事实上,WS 个体完成任务需要更多的时间,犯更多的错误,完成无错误的试次更少,搜索效率更低,空间跨度更短,无访问次数更多,并且表现出明显的坚持和忽视某些桶的倾向。此外,WS 个体的探索模式与对照组儿童相比表现出混乱。WS 对表现的影响是特定于配置易于以有原则的方式探索的敏感性的特定影响。在具有强烈空间约束的十字形配置中,两组都表现出最差的表现。在矩阵配置中,WS 患者改变的探索策略主要影响了他们的中心探索。集群配置中的表现表明,在 TD 和 WS 组中,分块都是一种优势策略。总之,WS 个体在本探索性测试中表现出的缺陷可被视为其在现实世界中空间定向和运动感知困难的指标。在 WS 中报告的神经解剖学改变中讨论了对空间信息处理的明显损害。

相似文献

1
Explorative function in Williams syndrome analyzed through a large-scale task with multiple rewards.通过具有多种奖励的大规模任务分析威廉姆斯综合征的探索功能。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):972-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
2
Explorative function in Prader-Willi syndrome analyzed through an ecological spatial task.通过生态空间任务分析普拉德-威利综合征的探索功能。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;38:97-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
3
Cerebellar damage loosens the strategic use of the spatial structure of the search space.小脑损伤削弱了搜索空间的空间结构的策略性使用。
Cerebellum. 2010 Mar;9(1):29-41. doi: 10.1007/s12311-009-0134-4.
4
In-depth analysis of spatial cognition in Williams syndrome: A critical assessment of the role of the LIMK1 gene.威廉姆斯综合征空间认知的深入分析:对LIMK1基因作用的批判性评估
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(5):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
5
From genes to brain development to phenotypic behavior: "dorsal-stream vulnerability" in relation to spatial cognition, attention, and planning of actions in Williams syndrome (WS) and other developmental disorders.从基因到大脑发育再到表型行为:“背侧流脆弱性”与空间认知、注意力和威廉姆斯综合征(WS)及其他发育障碍中的动作规划有关。
Prog Brain Res. 2011;189:261-83. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53884-0.00029-4.
6
Neurobiological models of visuospatial cognition in children with Williams syndrome: measures of dorsal-stream and frontal function.威廉姆斯综合征患儿视觉空间认知的神经生物学模型:背侧流和额叶功能的测量
Dev Neuropsychol. 2003;23(1-2):139-72. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2003.9651890.
7
Spatial competences in Williams syndrome: a radial arm maze study.威廉姆斯综合征的空间能力:一项放射状臂迷宫研究。
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2009 May;27(3):205-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
8
Egocentric and allocentric navigation strategies in Williams syndrome and typical development.威廉姆斯综合征和正常发育中的自我中心与他我中心导航策略
Dev Sci. 2014 Nov;17(6):920-34. doi: 10.1111/desc.12176. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
9
Evidence for unusual spatial location coding in Williams syndrome: an explanation for the local bias in visuo-spatial construction tasks?威廉姆斯综合征中异常空间位置编码的证据:对视觉空间构建任务中局部偏向的一种解释?
Brain Cogn. 2005 Nov;59(2):159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.05.011. Epub 2005 Jul 25.
10
Exploring spatial working memory performance in individuals with Williams syndrome: the effect of presentation format and configuration.探索威廉姆斯综合征患者的空间工作记忆表现:呈现格式和配置的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Feb;37:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.031. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of social motivation in sharing and fairness: insights from Williams syndrome.社会动机在分享和公平中的作用:来自威廉姆斯综合征的启示。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Aug 31;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09568-3.
2
Measuring spatial navigation during locomotion in children: A systematic review.测量儿童运动过程中的空间导航能力:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 28;10(13):e33817. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33817. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
3
Executive function and spatial abilities in physically active children: an explorative study.
身体活跃儿童的执行功能和空间能力:一项探索性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Jun 4;12(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01785-8.
4
Visuospatial working memory abilities in children analyzed by the bricks game task (BGT).利用砖块游戏任务(BGT)分析儿童的视空间工作记忆能力。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2111-2119. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01803-1. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
5
A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal.对唐氏综合征和威廉姆斯综合征空间能力的批判性综述:并非所有空间都是一样的。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;12:669320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669320. eCollection 2021.
6
Path Integration and Cognitive Mapping Capacities in Down and Williams Syndromes.唐氏综合征和威廉姆斯综合征中的路径整合与认知地图能力。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 11;11:571394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.571394. eCollection 2020.
7
Peripersonal Visuospatial Abilities in Williams Syndrome Analyzed by a Table Radial Arm Maze Task.通过桌面放射状臂迷宫任务分析威廉姆斯综合征患者的个人周边视觉空间能力
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 20;14:254. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00254. eCollection 2020.
8
The Development of Spatial Memory Analyzed by Means of Ecological Walking Task.通过生态步行任务分析空间记忆的发展
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 29;10:728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00728. eCollection 2019.
9
Dissociable spatial memory systems revealed by typical and atypical human development.典型和非典型人类发育所揭示的可分离空间记忆系统。
Dev Sci. 2019 Mar;22(2):e12737. doi: 10.1111/desc.12737. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
10
Route knowledge and configural knowledge in typical and atypical development: a comparison of sparse and rich environments.典型与非典型发育中的路线知识和构型知识:稀疏与丰富环境的比较
J Neurodev Disord. 2015 Dec 15;7:37. doi: 10.1186/s11689-015-9133-6. eCollection 2015.