Chartier-Kastler E, Ballanger P, Belas M, Biserte J, Corbel L, Gamé X, Grise P, Karsenty G, Le Normand L, Mauroy B, Pasquale J, Ruffion A, Rousseau T, Saussine C, Suberville M, Tollon C
Service d'urologie, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris-VI, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
Prog Urol. 2011 Mar;21(3):209-17. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2010.05.008.
To analyse current practice patterns and to evaluate (long-term) effectiveness and adverse events of sacral neuromodulation with InterStim™ Therapy based on data collected in a national register and to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the register.
This is a French multicenter prospective observational trial including patients with a permanent implant (2003-2009). Voiding diary variables and patient satisfaction were analysed based on last follow-up visit since implantation.
One thousand four hundred and eighteen patients (median age: 63 years, 1206 females) were included in the database (median follow-up: 12 months). One thousand and eighty-nine patients had non-neurological disease. The principal diagnosis was overactive bladder syndrome ([OAB], n=1170) and retention (n=151). Implantation occurred in 1358 patients; 1172 patients had greater than or equal to one registered follow-up. Clinical improvement of greater than or equal to 50% was seen in 447/527 patients with OAB at 12 months follow-up (median number of voids per 24 hours decreased from 15 at baseline to 8 at 12 months) and in 42/54 of patients with retention (median number of catheterization per 24 hours dropped from 5 at baseline to 0 at 12 months). Clinical improvement remained relatively stable up to 60 months. Median patient satisfaction with treatment was between 60 and 80%. Five hundred and twenty-four patients had at least one adverse event; loss of efficacy (n=244) occurred most frequently.
In this large database sacral neuromodulation with InterStim™ Therapy seems to be an effective treatment through routine practice in the long-term (up to 60 months) for patients refractory to medical treatment.
基于国家登记处收集的数据,分析当前的治疗模式,评估采用InterStim™疗法进行骶神经调节的(长期)有效性和不良事件,并讨论该登记处的优缺点。
这是一项法国多中心前瞻性观察性试验,纳入了永久植入患者(2003 - 2009年)。根据植入后的最后一次随访,分析排尿日记变量和患者满意度。
1418例患者(中位年龄:63岁,1206例女性)纳入数据库(中位随访时间:12个月)。1089例患者患有非神经疾病。主要诊断为膀胱过度活动症([OAB],n = 1170)和尿潴留(n = 151)。1358例患者进行了植入;1172例患者有一次或以上的登记随访。在12个月随访时,447/527例OAB患者临床改善≥50%(每24小时排尿中位数从基线时的15次降至12个月时的8次),42/54例尿潴留患者临床改善≥50%(每24小时导尿中位数从基线时的5次降至12个月时的0次)。临床改善在长达60个月时保持相对稳定。患者对治疗的中位满意度在60%至80%之间。524例患者至少发生一次不良事件;疗效丧失(n = 244)最为常见。
在这个大型数据库中,对于药物治疗无效的患者,采用InterStim™疗法进行骶神经调节似乎是一种长期(长达60个月)有效的常规治疗方法。