Suppr超能文献

SNaPshot 和 StripAssay 可作为直接测序的有价值的替代方法,用于结肠癌常规诊断中的 KRAS 基因突变检测。

SNaPshot and StripAssay as valuable alternatives to direct sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in colon cancer routine diagnostics.

机构信息

PAMM Laboratory for Pathology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2011 Mar;13(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.10.006.

Abstract

Although direct sequencing is the gold standard for KRAS mutation detection in routine diagnostics, it remains laborious, time consuming, and not very sensitive. Our objective was to evaluate SNaPshot and the KRAS StripAssay as alternatives to sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in daily practice. KRAS exon 2-specific PCR followed by sequencing or by a SNaPshot reaction was performed. For the StripAssay, a mutant-enriched PCR was followed by hybridization to KRAS-specific probes bound to a nitrocellulose strip. To test sensitivities, dilution series of mutated DNA in wild-type DNA were made. Additionally, direct sequencing and SNaPshot were evaluated in 296 colon cancer samples. Detection limits of direct sequencing, SNaPshot, and StripAssay were 20%, 10%, and 1% tumor cells, respectively. Direct sequencing and SNaPshot can detect all 12 mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13, whereas the StripAssay detects 10 of the most frequent ones. Workload and time to results are comparable for SNaPshot and direct sequencing. SNaPshot is flexible and easy to multiplex. The StripAssay is less time consuming for daily laboratory practice. SNaPshot is more flexible and slightly more sensitive than direct sequencing. The clinical evaluation showed comparable performances between direct sequencing and SNaPshot. The StripAssay is rapid and an extremely sensitive assay that could be considered when few tumor cells are available. However, found mutants should be confirmed to avoid risk of false positives.

摘要

虽然直接测序是 KRAS 突变检测的金标准,但它仍然繁琐、耗时且不够敏感。我们的目的是评估 SNaPshot 和 KRAS StripAssay 作为替代测序的方法,用于日常实践中的 KRAS 突变检测。进行 KRAS 外显子 2 特异性 PCR 后,进行测序或 SNaPshot 反应。对于 StripAssay,进行突变富集 PCR 后,与结合到硝酸纤维素条上的 KRAS 特异性探针杂交。为了测试灵敏度,在野生型 DNA 中制作了突变 DNA 的稀释系列。此外,直接测序和 SNaPshot 还在 296 个结肠癌样本中进行了评估。直接测序、SNaPshot 和 StripAssay 的检测限分别为 20%、10%和 1%的肿瘤细胞。直接测序和 SNaPshot 可以检测 KRAS 密码子 12 和 13 中的所有 12 种突变,而 StripAssay 可以检测到最常见的 10 种突变。SNaPshot 和直接测序的工作量和结果时间相当。SNaPshot 具有灵活性且易于多重检测。StripAssay 对于日常实验室实践来说,时间消耗更少。SNaPshot 比直接测序更灵活且略为敏感。临床评估显示直接测序和 SNaPshot 具有相当的性能。StripAssay 快速且是一种极其敏感的检测方法,当肿瘤细胞数量较少时可以考虑使用。但是,应该对发现的突变进行确认,以避免假阳性的风险。

相似文献

10
Study of KRAS new predictive marker in a clinical laboratory.在临床实验室中对 KRAS 新预测标志物的研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2012 Dec;14(12):937-42. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0886-z. Epub 2012 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

5
Role of oncogenic KRAS in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer.致癌性 KRAS 在胰腺癌的诊断、预后和治疗中的作用。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;17(3):153-168. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0245-4. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验