PAMM Laboratory for Pathology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
J Mol Diagn. 2011 Mar;13(2):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2010.10.006.
Although direct sequencing is the gold standard for KRAS mutation detection in routine diagnostics, it remains laborious, time consuming, and not very sensitive. Our objective was to evaluate SNaPshot and the KRAS StripAssay as alternatives to sequencing for KRAS mutation detection in daily practice. KRAS exon 2-specific PCR followed by sequencing or by a SNaPshot reaction was performed. For the StripAssay, a mutant-enriched PCR was followed by hybridization to KRAS-specific probes bound to a nitrocellulose strip. To test sensitivities, dilution series of mutated DNA in wild-type DNA were made. Additionally, direct sequencing and SNaPshot were evaluated in 296 colon cancer samples. Detection limits of direct sequencing, SNaPshot, and StripAssay were 20%, 10%, and 1% tumor cells, respectively. Direct sequencing and SNaPshot can detect all 12 mutations in KRAS codons 12 and 13, whereas the StripAssay detects 10 of the most frequent ones. Workload and time to results are comparable for SNaPshot and direct sequencing. SNaPshot is flexible and easy to multiplex. The StripAssay is less time consuming for daily laboratory practice. SNaPshot is more flexible and slightly more sensitive than direct sequencing. The clinical evaluation showed comparable performances between direct sequencing and SNaPshot. The StripAssay is rapid and an extremely sensitive assay that could be considered when few tumor cells are available. However, found mutants should be confirmed to avoid risk of false positives.
虽然直接测序是 KRAS 突变检测的金标准,但它仍然繁琐、耗时且不够敏感。我们的目的是评估 SNaPshot 和 KRAS StripAssay 作为替代测序的方法,用于日常实践中的 KRAS 突变检测。进行 KRAS 外显子 2 特异性 PCR 后,进行测序或 SNaPshot 反应。对于 StripAssay,进行突变富集 PCR 后,与结合到硝酸纤维素条上的 KRAS 特异性探针杂交。为了测试灵敏度,在野生型 DNA 中制作了突变 DNA 的稀释系列。此外,直接测序和 SNaPshot 还在 296 个结肠癌样本中进行了评估。直接测序、SNaPshot 和 StripAssay 的检测限分别为 20%、10%和 1%的肿瘤细胞。直接测序和 SNaPshot 可以检测 KRAS 密码子 12 和 13 中的所有 12 种突变,而 StripAssay 可以检测到最常见的 10 种突变。SNaPshot 和直接测序的工作量和结果时间相当。SNaPshot 具有灵活性且易于多重检测。StripAssay 对于日常实验室实践来说,时间消耗更少。SNaPshot 比直接测序更灵活且略为敏感。临床评估显示直接测序和 SNaPshot 具有相当的性能。StripAssay 快速且是一种极其敏感的检测方法,当肿瘤细胞数量较少时可以考虑使用。但是,应该对发现的突变进行确认,以避免假阳性的风险。