• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切除与一期修复对比研究 vs Limberg 皮瓣。

Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap.

机构信息

Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.009
PMID:21354343
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pilonidal disease is a common chronic disorder, mostly affecting young adult males. Different hypotheses have been introduced for this disease, but acquired pathogenesis is the most acceptable one. Furthermore, different types of intervention are performed based on its pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to compare excision with primary repair versus the Limberg flap.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients, who were enrolled in this study were randomly divided into two groups of 50 patients. One group underwent excision with primary repair and the other group rhomboid excision with the Limberg flap. Then the demographic characteristics, early and late complications, comfort and pain score on the first and fourth postoperative day, hospital stay, time of return to work, and patient satisfaction were compared. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age was 24 years and the male to female ratio was 4:1. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, operation time, early complication rate and recurrence. But significant difference was observed in return to work, first pain-free toilet sitting, pain score and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

It seems that the Limberg flap has similar complications as the primary repair method, but earlier return to work and less hospital stay, lower pain score and higher comfort and satisfaction were the advantages of the Limberg flap method. Thus, this method is recommended for the treatment of primary pilonidal disease.

摘要

介绍

藏毛窦疾病是一种常见的慢性疾病,主要影响年轻成年男性。对于这种疾病,已经提出了不同的假说,但后天发病机制是最被接受的。此外,根据其发病机制,还进行了不同类型的干预。本研究旨在比较切除加一期修复与 Limberg 皮瓣的疗效。

材料与方法

本研究共纳入 100 例患者,随机分为两组,每组 50 例。一组行切除加一期修复,另一组行菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣。然后比较两组的人口统计学特征、早期和晚期并发症、术后第 1 天和第 4 天的舒适度和疼痛评分、住院时间、重返工作的时间以及患者满意度。P<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

平均年龄为 24 岁,男女比例为 4:1。两组在人口统计学特征、手术时间、早期并发症发生率和复发率方面无显著差异。但在重返工作、首次无痛苦如厕、疼痛评分和患者满意度方面存在显著差异。

结论

Limberg 皮瓣与一期修复方法的并发症相似,但 Limberg 皮瓣方法更早地恢复工作,住院时间更短,疼痛评分更低,舒适度和满意度更高。因此,推荐该方法治疗原发性藏毛窦疾病。

相似文献

1
Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap.切除与一期修复对比研究 vs Limberg 皮瓣。
Int J Surg. 2011;9(4):343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
2
[Comparison of Treatments for an Infected Pilonidal Sinus: Differences in Scar Quality and Outcome Between Secondary Wound Healing and Limberg Flap in a Prospective Study].[感染性藏毛窦治疗方法的比较:前瞻性研究中二期伤口愈合与林贝格皮瓣在瘢痕质量和结局方面的差异]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2016 Apr;48(2):111-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111322. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.原发骶尾部藏毛窦行一期缝合或菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣转移术治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02473.x.
4
Treatment of young patients with pilonidal sinus disease with the original (unmodified) Limberg flap standardized for the first time.首次对年轻的藏毛窦患者采用标准化原始(未改良)Limberg 皮瓣进行治疗。
Pediatr Int. 2020 Oct;62(10):1171-1176. doi: 10.1111/ped.14277. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Contralateral Limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal disease recurrence.双侧 Limberg 皮瓣重建术治疗藏毛窦疾病复发。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Aug;42(8):787-791. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Modified Limberg flap technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in teenagers.改良Limberg皮瓣技术治疗青少年藏毛窦疾病
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1610-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
7
Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision.藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:切除后一期缝合或皮瓣重建。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
8
Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease.Limberg皮瓣和Karydakis皮瓣在复发性藏毛窦疾病中的疗效
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 May;70(5):350-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08. Epub 2015 May 1.
9
Comparison of modified limberg flap and modified elliptical rotation flap for pilonidal sinus surgery: a retrospective cohort study.改良 Limberg 皮瓣与改良椭圆旋转皮瓣治疗藏毛窦的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt A):74-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
10
[Sequential intervention with primary excision and Limberg plastic surgery procedure for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus : Results of a pilot study].[采用一期切除和Limberg整形手术序贯干预治疗骶尾部藏毛窦:一项初步研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2015 Aug;86(8):771-5. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2963-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the Mechanical Forces on the Sacrum Can Help Optimize Flap-based Pilonidal Sinus Reconstruction.了解骶骨上的机械力有助于优化皮瓣法藏毛窦重建术。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 19;12(6):e5923. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005923. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Midline and off-midline wound closure methods after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.中线和非中线切口关闭方法在经皮内镜治疗骶尾部藏毛窦术后的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;1(1):CD015213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015213.pub2.
3
Comparison of Crystallized Phenol Application and the Karydakis Flap Technique in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeally Localized Pilonidal Sinus Disease.
结晶酚应用与卡里达基斯皮瓣技术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的比较
Cureus. 2021 May 14;13(5):e15030. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15030.
4
German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020.德国国家指南:肛门部藏毛窦疾病管理:2020 年更新版
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02060-1. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肛门部藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.
6
A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.对比皮瓣重建与敞开引流术或切除直接缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病的效果:一项随机研究的荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2019 Oct;16(5):1119-1135. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13163. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
7
Limberg flap reconstruction for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with and without acute abscess: Our experience and a review of the literature.林贝格皮瓣重建术治疗伴或不伴急性脓肿的骶尾部藏毛窦疾病:我们的经验及文献综述
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):235-240. doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.01312. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
8
Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.与Limberg皮瓣术相比,一期中线缝合切除术治疗骶尾部藏毛疾病的随机临床试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):21-29. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0144. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
9
A new surgical approach for pilonidal sinus disease: "de-epithelialization technique''.藏毛窦疾病的一种新手术方法:“去上皮化技术”
Turk J Surg. 2018 Jan 4;34(1):43-48. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3632. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.藏毛窦疾病手术治疗中相同技术-同一外科医生手术方式的对比分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Aug;93(2):82-87. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.2.82. Epub 2017 Jul 28.