• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACS-NSQIP 标准与危重症手术患者的 APACHE 严重程度和结局相关。

ACS-NSQIP criteria are associated with APACHE severity and outcomes in critically ill surgical patients.

机构信息

University of Maryland Medical Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Mar;212(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.011
PMID:21356486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Similarity between the ICU patient data acquired by the APACHE system and the patient outcomes data acquired by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) suggests that variables in NSQIP data could be effective mortality predictors. We theorized that identifying ACS-NSQIP preoperative data points predictive of patient outcomes would assist in identifying potential complications earlier.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 2006 and 2008 at the University of Maryland Medical Center, we identified 340 surgical ICU patients included in both databases as our study cohort. Median APACHE score calculation permitted division of study subjects into quartiles from which to examine length of stay, mortality variables, and ACS-NSQIP-recorded postoperative occurrences and preoperative risk factors. Outcomes were compared using each database's percentage of patients who had died.

RESULTS

Mortality was positively correlated with APACHE score increases. Initially, the average ICU length of stay increased, then declined. Most common postoperative occurrences were ventilator dependence >48 hours, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, sepsis, and septic shock. It was also noted that preoperative variables, such as American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and serum albumin levels, had an association with a poorer prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

APACHE score predictions are consistent with ACS-NSQIP-recorded postoperative outcomes. Higher APACHE scores correlated with increased incidence of postoperative outcomes and were associated with earlier mortality in the most extremely ill. Poorer states of health before surgery also correlated with poor outcomes postoperatively.

摘要

背景

APACHE 系统获取的 ICU 患者数据与美国外科医师学会全国手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)获取的患者结局数据之间存在相似性,这表明 NSQIP 数据中的变量可能是有效的死亡率预测指标。我们推测,确定与患者结局相关的 ACS-NSQIP 术前数据点将有助于更早地识别潜在并发症。

研究设计

在 2006 年至 2008 年期间,我们在马里兰大学医学中心确定了同时包含在这两个数据库中的 340 名外科 ICU 患者作为我们的研究队列。中位数 APACHE 评分计算允许将研究对象分为四分位数,以检查住院时间、死亡率变量以及 ACS-NSQIP 记录的术后事件和术前危险因素。使用每个数据库中死亡患者的百分比来比较结果。

结果

死亡率与 APACHE 评分的增加呈正相关。最初,ICU 平均住院时间增加,然后下降。最常见的术后事件是呼吸机依赖>48 小时、肺炎、计划外插管、败血症和感染性休克。还注意到术前变量,如美国麻醉医师协会分类和血清白蛋白水平,与预后不良有关。

结论

APACHE 评分预测与 ACS-NSQIP 记录的术后结局一致。更高的 APACHE 评分与术后结局发生率的增加相关,与最病重患者的更早死亡率相关。手术前更差的健康状况也与术后不良结局相关。

相似文献

1
ACS-NSQIP criteria are associated with APACHE severity and outcomes in critically ill surgical patients.ACS-NSQIP 标准与危重症手术患者的 APACHE 严重程度和结局相关。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Mar;212(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.011.
2
Missing data and interpretation of cancer surgery outcomes at the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划中癌症手术结果的缺失数据和解释。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Sep;213(3):379-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
3
Developing a NSQIP module to measure outcomes in children's surgical care: opportunity and challenge.开发一个用于衡量儿童外科护理结果的NSQIP模块:机遇与挑战。
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 May;17(2):131-40. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2008.02.009.
4
Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.手术并发症及死亡情况的识别:传统外科发病率和死亡率会议与美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划的评估比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):618-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.010. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
5
Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.评估先天性和小儿心脏病患者治疗结果的数据库——重症监护视角
Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:130-6. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002886.
6
Risk scoring in perioperative and surgical intensive care patients: a review.围手术期及外科重症监护患者的风险评分:综述
Curr Surg. 2006 May-Jun;63(3):226-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2006.02.005.
7
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
8
Severity of illness and risk of readmission to intensive care: a meta-analysis.疾病严重程度与重症监护病房再入院风险:一项荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2009 May;80(5):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.02.015. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
9
Missing data in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are not missing at random: implications and potential impact on quality assessments.美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划中的缺失数据并非随机缺失:对质量评估的影响和潜在影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Feb;210(2):125-139.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.021.
10
Morbidity and mortality after colorectal procedures: comparison of data from the American College of Surgeons case log system and the ACS NSQIP.结直肠手术后的发病率和死亡率:美国外科医师学会病例记录系统和 ACS NSQIP 数据的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):1077-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) scoring system in predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: A retrospective study.急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分系统与美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)评分系统在预测急诊剖腹手术患者术后死亡率中的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Mar;68(3):231-237. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_888_23. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
Prognostic Value of Serum Albumin Level in Critically Ill Patients: Observational Data From Large Intensive Care Unit Databases.危重症患者血清白蛋白水平的预后价值:来自大型重症监护病房数据库的观察性数据
Front Nutr. 2022 Jun 13;9:770674. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.770674. eCollection 2022.
3
A scoping review of registry captured indicators for evaluating quality of critical care in ICU.一项关于评估重症监护病房(ICU)重症护理质量的登记指标的范围综述。
J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 5;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00556-6.
4
Approach to an obstetric prognosis scale: The modified SOFA scale.产科预后评估量表的方法:改良SOFA量表。
Ghana Med J. 2016 Sep;50(3):129-135.
5
Risk Models of Operative Morbidities in 16,930 Critically Ill Surgical Patients Based on a Japanese Nationwide Database.基于日本全国性数据库的16930例重症外科患者手术并发症风险模型
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(30):e1224. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001224.
6
Surgical risk model for acute diffuse peritonitis based on a Japanese nationwide database: an initial report on the surgical and 30-day mortality.基于日本全国数据库的急性弥漫性腹膜炎手术风险模型:手术及30天死亡率的初步报告
Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1233-43. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1026-x. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
7
Outcomes measures and risk adjustment.结果指标与风险调整
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013 Fall;51(4):10-21. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3182a70a52.