• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎关节成形术后矢状位排列。

Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.

机构信息

Indiana Spine Group, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46260, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):991-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70
PMID:21358477
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial from one study site.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the radiographic sagittal alignment of the Bryan cervical disc for one-level disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prospective, randomized studies demonstrate Bryan arthroplasty provides statistically better functional outcomes than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Uncontrolled case reports describe kyphosis after disc replacement. No prospective study has critically assessed sagittal alignment after cervical arthroplasty.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Quantitative motion analysis determined the change in overall (C2-C7) and treatment-level sagittal alignment, disc space heights, and range of motion.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, overall sagittal alignment was equivalent in the two groups. At 24-month follow-up, overall lordosis for the cohorts was not statistically different from preoperative values for each group. In addition, overall lordosis was not significantly different at 24 months when comparing Bryan patients with the fusion patients. The average change in disc angle from preoperative to immediate postoperative at the treated level in the Bryan disc group was a nonsignificant increase in lordosis of 0.92°. The anterior disc height was the same at all time points, but the posterior disc height was slightly (0.7 mm) more in the Bryan than in the fusion patients (P = 0.04). The angular range of motion in the Bryan group was statistically equivalent at all time points. At the fused levels, average range of motion decreased from 6.4° to 0.9° at 24 months (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

With the Bryan disc, there was an insignificant increase in lordosis of 0.9° at immediate postoperative time point. Overall cervical sagittal alignment is not different between the experimental and control populations. This prospective study does not demonstrate a clinically significant increase in segmental kyphosis after Bryan disc arthroplasty. Global cervical lordosis is statistically equivalent between arthroplasty and fusion groups at 2 years follow-up.

摘要

研究设计

来自一个研究地点的前瞻性、随机、食品和药物管理局研究性设备豁免试验。

研究目的

检查 Bryan 颈椎间盘在单节段疾病中的放射矢状位排列。

背景资料概要

前瞻性、随机研究表明,Bryan 关节成形术在功能结果方面明显优于前路颈椎间盘切除融合术。未经对照的病例报告描述了椎间盘置换后的后凸畸形。没有前瞻性研究对颈椎置换术后的矢状位排列进行过严格评估。

方法

对 48 例患者进行了回顾性分析,随访时间至少为 2 年。定量运动分析确定了总(C2-C7)和治疗节段矢状位排列、椎间盘高度和活动范围的变化。

结果

术前两组的总矢状位排列相当。在 24 个月的随访中,两组的总脊柱前凸与术前值无统计学差异。此外,在比较 Bryan 组和融合组患者时,24 个月时总脊柱前凸没有显著差异。Bryan 椎间盘组治疗节段从术前到术后即刻椎间盘角度的平均变化是脊柱前凸增加了 0.92°,但无统计学意义。前椎间盘高度在所有时间点都相同,但 Bryan 组的后椎间盘高度比融合组略高(0.7mm,P=0.04)。Bryan 组的角度活动范围在所有时间点均具有统计学意义。在融合节段,平均活动范围从 24 个月的 6.4°降至 0.9°(P<0.0001)。

结论

Bryan 椎间盘在术后即刻有 0.9°的脊柱前凸轻度增加。实验组和对照组的颈椎整体矢状位排列没有差异。这项前瞻性研究没有显示 Bryan 椎间盘置换术后节段性后凸畸形有临床意义的增加。在 2 年随访时,颈椎整体前凸在关节成形术组和融合组之间具有统计学等效性。

相似文献

1
Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty.颈椎关节成形术后矢状位排列。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):991-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182076d70.
2
Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis?使用Bryan颈椎间盘假体手术后的节段性排列不齐:它与假体的力学和设计有关吗?
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):372-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bccc69.
3
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.融合术和Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
4
Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.人工颈椎间盘的临床和影像学分析:Prestige 前瞻性随机对照临床试验 7 年随访:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
5
Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.颈椎间盘置换术及颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的颈椎矢状位排列:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验的结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2001-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fe6.
6
Quality of spinal motion with cervical disk arthroplasty: computer-aided radiographic analysis.颈椎间盘置换术后脊柱运动质量:计算机辅助放射学分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):89-95. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181991413.
7
Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.颈椎置换术后的临床和影像学结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006 Sep;148(9):943-50. doi: 10.1007/s00701-006-0805-6. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
8
Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.颈椎间盘置换和前路融合术后的索引和相邻节段运动学:体内定量放射学分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Apr 20;36(9):721-30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df10fc.
9
Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.Bryan颈椎间盘假体颈椎置换术的早期临床和影像学结果。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct;19(7):465-70. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211235.76093.6b.
10
Sagittal alignment comparison of Bryan disc arthroplasty with ProDisc-C arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.Bryan椎间盘置换术与ProDisc-C椎间盘置换术矢状位对线比较:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Aug;24(6):381-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318201855f.

引用本文的文献

1
Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Literature Review and Future Directions.颈椎矢状位排列:文献综述与未来方向。
Neurospine. 2020 Sep;17(3):478-496. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040392.196. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Comparison of 10-year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy.脊髓病和神经根病患者行 Bryan 颈椎间盘置换术 10 年疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1127-1134. doi: 10.1111/os.12565. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
3
The association of cervical sagittal alignment with adjacent segment degeneration.颈椎矢状位排列与邻近节段退变的关系。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2655-2664. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06157-0. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
4
Heterotopic ossification is related to change in disc space angle after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术后 Prestige-LP 发生异位骨化与椎间盘间隙角变化有关。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Oct;28(10):2359-2370. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06053-7. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术与颈椎融合术治疗颈椎间盘退变疾病的卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(3):1-223. eCollection 2019.
6
Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study.颈椎间盘置换术的临床和影像学结果:十年随访研究
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2389-2396. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3947-2. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.Bryan颈椎间盘置换术的疗效:15年随访
Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):851-857. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3745-2. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
8
Cervical sagittal alignment after different anterior discectomy procedures for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: randomized controlled trial.单节段颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病不同前路椎间盘切除术后的颈椎矢状位排列:随机对照试验
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Dec;159(12):2359-2365. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3312-z. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
9
10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.Bryan颈椎间盘假体植入术后10年随访。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1191-1198. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4897-2. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Comparison of 2 Zero-Profile Implants in the Treatment of Single-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Preliminary Clinical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty versus Fusion.两种零切迹椎间融合器治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病的比较:颈椎间盘置换与融合术的初步临床研究
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159761. eCollection 2016.