• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bravo pH 监测的日常差异与下食管括约肌的恶化程度和反流性疾病的严重程度有关。

Day-to-day discrepancy in Bravo pH monitoring is related to the degree of deterioration of the lower esophageal sphincter and severity of reflux disease.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2219-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1529-5. Epub 2011 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1529-5
PMID:21359906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3116124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Bravo capsule allows monitoring of esophageal acid exposure over a two-day period. Experience has shown that 24-32% of patients will have abnormal esophageal acid exposure detected on only one of the 2 days monitored. This variation has been explained by the effect of endoscopy and sedation. The aim of this study was to assess the day-to-day discrepancy following transnasal placement of the Bravo capsule without endoscopy or sedation and to determine factors related to this variability.

METHODS

Bravo pH monitoring was performed by transnasal placement of the capsule in 310 patients. Patients were divided into groups based on the composite pH score: both days normal, both days abnormal and only one of the 2 days abnormal. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 310 patients evaluated, 60 (19%) showed a discrepancy between the 2 days. A total of 127 patients had a normal pH score on both days and 123 had an abnormal pH score on both days. Of the 60 patients with a discrepancy, 27 were abnormal the first day and 33 (55%) were abnormal the second day. Patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure on both days had higher degrees of esophageal acid exposure and were more likely to have a defective LES compared to those with an abnormal score on only one day (35 vs. 83%, p=0.027).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a discrepancy between days of Bravo pH monitoring have lower esophageal acid exposure. Variability between the 2 days represents early deterioration of the gastroesophageal barrier and indicates less advanced reflux disease.

摘要

背景

Bravo 胶囊可监测两天内的食管酸暴露情况。经验表明,在监测的两天中,有 24%-32%的患者仅在其中一天检测到食管酸暴露异常。这种差异可以通过内镜检查和镇静的影响来解释。本研究旨在评估 Bravo 胶囊经鼻放置后无需内镜检查和镇静的情况下,每日差异,并确定与这种可变性相关的因素。

方法

310 例患者经鼻置入 Bravo pH 监测胶囊。根据复合 pH 评分将患者分为两组:两天均正常、两天均异常和仅一天异常。比较两组之间的食管下括约肌(LES)特征。

结果

在 310 例评估的患者中,有 60 例(19%)出现了两天之间的差异。共有 127 例患者两天的 pH 评分均正常,123 例患者两天的 pH 评分均异常。在 60 例有差异的患者中,第一天异常的有 27 例,第二天异常的有 33 例(55%)。两天食管酸暴露异常的患者食管酸暴露程度较高,且 LES 功能不全的可能性较仅一天异常的患者更大(35%比 83%,p=0.027)。

结论

Bravo pH 监测两天之间有差异的患者食管酸暴露程度较低。两天之间的差异代表胃食管屏障的早期恶化,并表明反流性疾病进展程度较轻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/fa9e9f4113cc/464_2010_1529_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/165932289180/464_2010_1529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/df5823aeefba/464_2010_1529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/17fd9e7a3448/464_2010_1529_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/fa9e9f4113cc/464_2010_1529_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/165932289180/464_2010_1529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/df5823aeefba/464_2010_1529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/17fd9e7a3448/464_2010_1529_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96a4/3116124/fa9e9f4113cc/464_2010_1529_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Day-to-day discrepancy in Bravo pH monitoring is related to the degree of deterioration of the lower esophageal sphincter and severity of reflux disease.Bravo pH 监测的日常差异与下食管括约肌的恶化程度和反流性疾病的严重程度有关。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2219-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1529-5. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
2
24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.对于具有典型和非典型混合症状的患者,24小时多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测可能不是检测胃食管反流的充分测试。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1700-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3867-1. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
3
Safety and tolerability of transoral Bravo capsule placement after transnasal manometry using a validated conversion factor.使用经过验证的转换因子进行经鼻测压后经口放置Bravo胶囊的安全性和耐受性。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan;102(1):24-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00889.x. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
4
Esophageal pH monitoring with the BRAVO capsule: experience in a single tertiary medical center.BRAVO 胶囊食管 pH 监测:单中心三级医疗中心的经验。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011 Oct;53(4):404-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182203caa.
5
Wireless ambulatory pH studies: manometric or endoscopic guidance?无线动态 pH 研究:测压法还是内镜法?
Dis Esophagus. 2012 Jan;25(1):26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01218.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
6
Wireless capsules for esophageal pH monitoring: are we placing them correctly?用于食管pH监测的无线胶囊:我们放置得正确吗?
Digestion. 2010;82(1):54-9. doi: 10.1159/000264648. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
7
Nonendoscopic transnasal placement of a wireless capsule for esophageal pH monitoring: feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a manometry-guided procedure.用于食管pH监测的无线胶囊非内镜经鼻放置:测压引导程序的可行性、安全性和有效性
Endoscopy. 2006 Aug;38(8):813-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944526.
8
New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): clinical relevance.新型食管功能检测(阻抗检测、Bravo pH监测及高分辨率测压):临床相关性
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008 Jun;10(3):222-30. doi: 10.1007/s11894-008-0047-2.
9
Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.使用BRAVO pH监测系统时胃酸反流模式的日常变异性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;40(1):20-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000190753.25750.0e.
10
Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.48小时延长无线胶囊食管pH监测对胃食管反流病诊断及症状与反流发作关系评估的影响
Arq Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan-Mar;48(1):24-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032011000100006.

引用本文的文献

1
Current status of functional testing for upper gastrointestinal disorders: state-of-the-art review.上消化道疾病功能测试的现状:最新综述
Singapore Med J. 2025 Aug 1;66(8):431-438. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-106. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Utility of pH monitoring in surgical decision-making and outcome prediction in revisional antireflux surgery for anatomical failure.pH监测在解剖学失败的复发性抗反流手术的手术决策和结果预测中的效用。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug;39(8):4780-4790. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11857-4. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Prolonged acid reflux monitoring using acid exposure time and DeMeester score: two days are not enough.

本文引用的文献

1
Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: quantifying the association between body mass index, esophageal acid exposure, and lower esophageal sphincter status in a large series of patients with reflux symptoms.肥胖与胃食管反流:在大量有反流症状的患者中量化体重指数、食管酸暴露及食管下括约肌状态之间的关联
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Aug;13(8):1440-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0930-7. Epub 2009 May 28.
2
Measurement of gastric pH in ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring.动态食管pH监测中胃pH值的测量。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Sep;23(9):1968-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0218-0. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
3
Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy.
使用酸暴露时间和 DeMeester 评分进行长时间酸反流监测:两天是不够的。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2515-2521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10733-x. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Current Advancement on the Dynamic Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病动态机制的最新进展。
Int J Biol Sci. 2021 Oct 3;17(15):4154-4164. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.65066. eCollection 2021.
5
Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.开发并验证一种黏膜阻抗轮廓分析系统以区分食管疾病。
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1617-1626.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.253. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Does anti-reflux surgery disrupt the pathway of Barrett's esophagus progression to cancer?抗反流手术会破坏巴雷特食管进展为癌症的途径吗?
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec 5;3:101. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.11.07. eCollection 2018.
7
Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using the Bravo Capsule pH System.使用Bravo胶囊pH系统评估胃食管反流病
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jan 31;22(1):25-30. doi: 10.5056/jnm15151.
8
Clinical value of wireless pH-monitoring of gastro-esophageal reflux in children before and after proton pump inhibitors.质子泵抑制剂治疗前后儿童胃食管反流无线pH监测的临床价值
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 24;14:3. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0225-7.
9
24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.对于具有典型和非典型混合症状的患者,24小时多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测可能不是检测胃食管反流的充分测试。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1700-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3867-1. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
10
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with conscious sedation does not interfere with catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.清醒镇静下食管胃十二指肠镜检查不干扰基于导管的 24 小时 pH 监测。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 21;19(11):1805-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1805.
Bravo无导管pH监测:正常值、一致性、最佳诊断阈值及准确性。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jan;7(1):60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
4
Bravo (wireless) ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring: how do day 1 and day 2 results compare?Bravo(无线)动态食管pH监测:第1天和第2天的结果对比情况如何?
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug 14;13(30):4091-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i30.4091.
5
Wireless esophageal pH monitoring: new technique means new questions.无线食管pH监测:新技术带来新问题。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;40(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000196188.57543.75.
6
Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.使用BRAVO pH监测系统时胃酸反流模式的日常变异性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;40(1):20-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000190753.25750.0e.
7
Forty-eight-hour pH monitoring increases sensitivity in detecting abnormal esophageal acid exposure.48小时食管pH监测可提高检测食管异常酸暴露的敏感性。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Nov;9(8):1043-51; discussion 1051-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.011.
8
Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system.使用无线系统进行动态食管pH监测。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;98(4):740-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07398.x.
9
Effect of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities.动态24小时食管pH监测对引发反流活动的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 1999 Nov;44(11):2263-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1026608804938.
10
The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease.健康与疾病状态下的食管下括约肌
Am J Surg. 1988 Jan;155(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(88)80266-6.