Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Math Biosci Eng. 2011 Jan;8(1):141-70. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.141.
The lessons learned from the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic, as it moves out of the limelight, should not be under-estimated, particularly since the probability of novel influenza epidemics in the near future is not negligible and the potential consequences might be huge. Hence, as the world, particularly the industrialized world, responded to the potentially devastating effects of this novel A-H1N1 strain with substantial resources, reminders of the recurrent loss of life from a well established foe, seasonal influenza, could not be ignored. The uncertainties associated with the reported and expected levels of morbidity and mortality with this novel A-H1N1 live in a backdrop of deaths, over 200,000 hospitalizations, and millions of infections (20% of the population) attributed to seasonal influenza in the USA alone, each year. So, as the Northern Hemisphere braced for the possibility of a potentially "lethal" second wave of the novel A-H1N1 without a vaccine ready to mitigate its impact, questions of who should be vaccinated first if a vaccine became available, came to the forefront of the discussion. Uncertainty grew as we learned that the vaccine, once available, would be unevenly distributed around the world. Nations capable of acquiring large vaccine supplies soon became aware that those who could pay would have to compete for a limited vaccine stockpile. The challenges faced by nations dealing jointly with seasonal and novel A-H1N1 co-circulating strains under limited resources, that is, those with no access to novel A-H1N1 vaccine supplies, limited access to the seasonal influenza vaccine, and limited access to antivirals (like Tamiflu) are explored in this study. One- and two-strain models are introduced to mimic the influenza dynamics of a single and co-circulating strains, in the context of a single epidemic outbreak. Optimal control theory is used to identify and evaluate the "best" control policies. The controls account for the cost associated with social distancing and antiviral treatment policies. The optimal policies identified might have, if implemented, a substantial impact on the novel H1N1 and seasonal influenza co-circulating dynamics. Specifically, the implementation of antiviral treatment might reduce the number of influenza cases by up to 60% under a reasonable seasonal vaccination strategy, but only by up to 37% when the seasonal vaccine is not available. Optimal social distancing policies alone can be as effective as the combination of multiple policies, reducing the total number of influenza cases by more than 99% within a single outbreak, an unrealistic but theoretically possible outcome for isolated populations with limited resources.
从 2009-2010 年 H1N1 流感大流行中吸取的教训,随着它逐渐淡出人们的视野,不应被低估,尤其是因为在不久的将来发生新型流感疫情的可能性不可忽视,其潜在后果可能是巨大的。因此,当世界,特别是工业化世界,用大量资源应对这种新型 A-H1N1 株可能带来的破坏性影响时,人们无法忽视季节性流感导致的反复死亡。与这种新型 A-H1N1 相关的发病率和死亡率报告和预期水平存在不确定性,其背景是仅在美国,每年就有超过 20 万人因季节性流感住院治疗,数百万人感染(占人口的 20%)。因此,当北半球为可能没有疫苗来减轻其影响的新型 A-H1N1 的第二波“致命”浪潮做准备时,如果有疫苗,谁应该首先接种的问题成为讨论的焦点。随着我们了解到,一旦有疫苗供应,疫苗将在全球范围内分布不均,不确定性也随之增加。有能力获得大量疫苗供应的国家很快意识到,那些有能力支付的人将不得不争夺有限的疫苗库存。本研究探讨了在资源有限的情况下,应对季节性和新型 A-H1N1 共同流行株的国家面临的挑战,即那些无法获得新型 A-H1N1 疫苗供应、获得季节性流感疫苗的机会有限以及获得抗病毒药物(如达菲)的机会有限的国家。在单一流行疫情的背景下,引入了单株和共同流行株的流感动力学的单株和两株模型。最优控制理论用于识别和评估“最佳”控制策略。这些控制考虑了社会隔离和抗病毒治疗政策相关的成本。如果实施,所确定的最优政策可能会对新型 H1N1 和季节性流感共同流行动态产生重大影响。具体来说,在合理的季节性疫苗接种策略下,实施抗病毒治疗可能会使流感病例数量减少多达 60%,但在没有季节性疫苗的情况下,仅减少 37%。仅实施最优的社会隔离政策,就可以像多种政策相结合一样有效,在单个疫情爆发中使流感总病例数减少 99%以上,这是一种不现实但理论上可能的结果,对于资源有限的孤立人群来说。