Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug;32(4):393-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283279. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
In March 2009, cases of influenza-like illness in Mexico caused by a novel H1N1 virus containing genes from swine, avian, and human influenza strains were reported. Within several weeks, 2009 H1N1 disseminated rapidly and was the predominant influenza strain globally. On June 11, 2009, the World Health Organization declared that criteria for an influenza pandemic had been met. Concern that this pandemic would rival the 1918 pandemic was high. Fortunately, that was not the case. Influenza-related disease activity peaked in late October to November 2009. By August 2010, the H1N1 influenza virus had moved into the postpandemic period. During the 2010-2011 season, influenza A H3N2 has been the predominant serotype, but the 2009 H1N1 continues to co-circulate with H3N2 and B strains. In contrast to previous seasonal influenza strains, the novel 2009 H1N1 strain preferentially affected young adults, with a clustering of severe and fatal cases in adults between the ages of 30 and 50 years. Additionally, H1N1 displayed a heightened potential for severe lung injury as well as gastrointestinal symptoms. Risk factors for severe disease included obesity, morbid obesity, pregnancy, immunosuppression, asthma (in children), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurological disorders, other comorbidities, HIV-infection, poverty, and lack of access to care. However, >25% of deaths were in previously healthy individuals. Molecular tools for identifying 2009 H1N1 were rapidly developed, but the volume of samples quickly overwhelmed available laboratory services. Further, in the early phases of the pandemic, the volume of patients presenting to emergency rooms, acute care clinics, and physician's offices overwhelmed health care resources. Fortunately, most cases were mild; in the United States, only one in 400 required intensive care unit care, and one in 2000 died. Because most infected individuals have mild, self-limited disease, the risk/benefit assessment for early access to antiviral agents must balance the potential benefit for reducing transmission, disease severity, and burden on health care providers against the potential for dissemination of viral resistance and drug-related adverse events. Monovalent vaccines against 2009 H1N1 were developed and ready for distribution by September 2009, but initial supplies were inadequate to impact the bulk of cases that occurred in the Northern Hemisphere between April and September 2009. Continued efforts to develop universal vaccines and improve access to effective vaccines are critical.
2009 年 3 月,墨西哥出现了由猪、禽和人流感病毒基因组成的新型 H1N1 病毒引起的流感样病例。在几周内,2009 年 H1N1 迅速传播,成为全球主要的流感病毒株。2009 年 6 月 11 日,世界卫生组织宣布已达到流感大流行的标准。人们高度关注这种大流行将与 1918 年大流行相媲美。幸运的是,情况并非如此。与流感相关的疾病活动在 2009 年 10 月底至 11 月达到高峰。到 2010 年 8 月,H1N1 流感病毒已进入大流行后期。在 2010-2011 季节,甲型 H3N2 一直是主要的血清型,但 2009 年 H1N1 仍与 H3N2 和 B 株共同循环。与以往的季节性流感株不同,新型 2009 年 H1N1 株优先影响年轻人,30 至 50 岁的成年人中严重和致命病例聚集。此外,H1N1 表现出更严重的肺部损伤和胃肠道症状的潜力。严重疾病的危险因素包括肥胖、病态肥胖、妊娠、免疫抑制、儿童哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、神经系统疾病、其他合并症、HIV 感染、贫困和缺乏医疗保健。然而,超过 25%的死亡发生在原本健康的个体中。用于识别 2009 年 H1N1 的分子工具迅速得到开发,但样本数量迅速超过了现有实验室服务的能力。此外,在大流行的早期阶段,急诊室、急性护理诊所和医生办公室就诊的患者数量使医疗资源不堪重负。幸运的是,大多数病例都是轻度的;在美国,每 400 人中只有 1 人需要重症监护治疗,每 2000 人中只有 1 人死亡。由于大多数感染个体的病情轻微且具有自限性,因此尽早使用抗病毒药物的风险/效益评估必须权衡减少传播、疾病严重程度和对医疗保健提供者的负担的潜在益处,与病毒耐药性和药物相关不良事件的传播风险。针对 2009 年 H1N1 的单价疫苗已于 2009 年 9 月开发并准备分发,但最初的供应不足以影响 2009 年 4 月至 9 月期间在北半球发生的大部分病例。继续努力开发通用疫苗和改善有效疫苗的获取途径至关重要。