Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2011 Aug 3;104(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.02.033. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
Past experience can alter how individuals respond to stressful events. The brain serotonin system is a key factor modulating stress-related behavior and may contribute to individual variation in coping styles. In this study we investigated whether dominant and subordinate hamsters respond differently to social defeat and whether their behavioral responses are associated with changes in 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor immunoreactivity in several limbic brain regions. We paired weight-matched hamsters in daily aggressive encounters for two weeks so that they formed a stable dominance relationship. We also included controls that were exposed to an empty cage each day for two weeks. Twenty-four hours after the final pairing or empty cage exposure, subjects were socially defeated in 3, 5-min encounters with a more aggressive hamster. Twenty-four hours after social defeat, animals were tested for conditioned defeat in a 5-min social interaction test with a non-aggressive intruder. We collected brains following conditioned defeat testing and performed immunohistochemistry for 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. We found that dominants showed less submissive and defensive behavior at conditioned defeat testing compared to both subordinates and controls. Additionally, both dominants and subordinates had an increased number of 5-HT1A immunopositive cells in the basolateral amygdala compared to controls. Subordinates also had more 5-HT1A immunopositive cells in the dorsal medial amygdala than did controls. Finally, dominants had fewer 5-HT1A immunopositive cells in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus compared to controls. Our results indicate that dominant social status results in a blunted conditioned defeat response and a distinct pattern of 5-HT1A receptor expression, which may contribute to resistance to conditioned defeat.
以往的经验会改变个体对压力事件的反应。脑内血清素系统是调节应激相关行为的关键因素,可能导致个体应对方式的差异。在这项研究中,我们调查了优势和劣势仓鼠对社会挫败的反应是否不同,以及它们的行为反应是否与几种边缘脑区 5-HT1A 和 5-HT2A 受体免疫反应的变化有关。我们将体重匹配的仓鼠配对进行为期两周的日常攻击接触,以便它们形成稳定的优势关系。我们还包括了每天暴露在空笼子里两周的对照组。最后一次配对或空笼子暴露 24 小时后,动物接受了 3 次、每次 5 分钟的与更具攻击性的仓鼠的社会挫败。在社会挫败后 24 小时,动物在 5 分钟的非攻击性入侵者社交互动测试中进行条件性挫败测试。在条件性挫败测试后,我们收集大脑并进行 5-HT1A 和 5-HT2A 受体的免疫组织化学染色。我们发现,与对照组相比,优势仓鼠在条件性挫败测试中表现出较少的顺从和防御行为。此外,与对照组相比,优势仓鼠和劣势仓鼠的基底外侧杏仁核中 5-HT1A 免疫阳性细胞数量增加。与对照组相比,劣势仓鼠的背内侧杏仁核中 5-HT1A 免疫阳性细胞也更多。最后,与对照组相比,优势仓鼠的下丘脑室旁核中 5-HT1A 免疫阳性细胞较少。我们的结果表明,优势社会地位导致条件性挫败反应迟钝和 5-HT1A 受体表达的独特模式,这可能有助于抵抗条件性挫败。