Verardi Roberto, Iannopollo Gianmarco, Casolari Giulia, Nobile Giampiero, Capecchi Alessandro, Bruno Matteo, Lanzilotti Valerio, Casella Gianni
Ospedale Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi, Largo Nigrisoli 2, 40133 Bologna, Italy.
Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Cona, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206034.
Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) pose particular challenges in elderly patients. When high troponin levels are detected, the distinction between non-ischemic myocardial injury (NIMI), type 1, and type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is the necessary first step to guide further care. However, the assessment of signs of ischemia is hindered in older patients, and no simple clinical or laboratory tool proved useful in this discrimination task. Current evidence suggests a benefit of an invasive vs. conservative approach in terms of recurrence of MI, with no significant impact on mortality. In patients with multivessel disease in which the culprit lesion has been treated, a physiology-guided complete percutaneous revascularization significantly reduced major events. The management of ACS in elderly patients is an example of the actual need for a multimodal, thorough clinical approach, coupled with shared decision-making, in order to ensure the best treatment and avoid futility. Such a need will likely grow throughout the next decades, with the aging of the world population. In this narrative review, we address pivotal yet common questions arising in clinical practice while caring for elderly patients with ACS.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的诊断和治疗在老年患者中面临特殊挑战。当检测到肌钙蛋白水平升高时,区分1型非缺血性心肌损伤(NIMI)和2型心肌梗死(MI)是指导进一步治疗的必要第一步。然而,老年患者缺血迹象的评估受到阻碍,并且没有简单的临床或实验室工具被证明在此鉴别任务中有用。目前的证据表明,就心肌梗死复发而言,侵入性治疗与保守治疗相比有好处,对死亡率无显著影响。在罪犯病变已得到治疗的多支血管疾病患者中,生理学指导下的完全经皮血管重建显著减少了主要事件。老年患者ACS的管理是实际需要采用多模式、全面临床方法并结合共同决策的一个例子,以确保最佳治疗并避免无效治疗。随着世界人口老龄化,这种需求在未来几十年可能会增加。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们讨论在照顾老年ACS患者的临床实践中出现的关键且常见的问题。