• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

度洛西汀治疗抑郁症患者的临床和人口统计学预测因素:一项开放标签研究。

Clinical and demographic predictors of improvement during duloxetine treatment in patients with major depression: an open-label study.

机构信息

Depression Unit, Neuroscience Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(6):385-405. doi: 10.2165/11588800-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11588800-000000000-00000
PMID:21366360
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Currently evidence about clinical and demographic predictors of response to newer antidepressants such as duloxetine is limited. This study aimed to investigate whether a number of predictors, particularly co-morbid anxiety disorders and anxious depression, are associated with clinical improvement.

METHODS

One hundred and one outpatients suffering from major depression (MD) were treated with duloxetine and assessed at baseline and at weeks 2, 4 and 8 on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and at weeks 4 and 8 on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale.

RESULTS

Patients with co-morbid panic disorder or obsessive-compulsive disorder showed slowed improvements at 2 and 4 weeks compared with patients without such co-morbidities; however, they showed slightly higher or similar improvements, respectively, at 8 weeks. Also, anxious MD patients showed higher improvements compared with non-anxious MD patients at all time points, with the difference between groups increasing over time. Several other predictors, such as co-morbid premenstrual dysphoric disorder and lifetime generalized anxiety disorder, were also identified.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that co-morbidity with an anxiety disorder could negatively influence improvement following duloxetine treatment in the short term but that such a difference could be reversed by 8 weeks. However, given that the study had several limitations, including the lack of a comparison group and a flexible dosage design, further research is needed to replicate and extend these findings.

摘要

背景和目的

目前,关于度洛西汀等新型抗抑郁药的临床和人口统计学预测因素的证据有限。本研究旨在探讨一些预测因素,特别是共病焦虑障碍和焦虑性抑郁症,是否与临床改善相关。

方法

101 名患有重度抑郁症(MD)的门诊患者接受度洛西汀治疗,并在基线和第 2、4、8 周时使用 21 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)和第 4、8 周时使用临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)量表进行评估。

结果

与无共病焦虑障碍的患者相比,伴发惊恐障碍或强迫症的患者在第 2 周和第 4 周的改善速度较慢;然而,在第 8 周时,他们的改善程度分别略高或相似。此外,焦虑性 MD 患者在所有时间点的改善程度均高于非焦虑性 MD 患者,且组间差异随时间推移而增加。还确定了其他一些预测因素,如共病经前烦躁障碍和终身广泛性焦虑障碍。

结论

我们的结果表明,共病焦虑障碍可能会在短期内对度洛西汀治疗后的改善产生负面影响,但这种差异可能在第 8 周时得到逆转。然而,鉴于该研究存在一些局限性,包括缺乏对照组和灵活的剂量设计,需要进一步研究来复制和扩展这些发现。

相似文献

1
Clinical and demographic predictors of improvement during duloxetine treatment in patients with major depression: an open-label study.度洛西汀治疗抑郁症患者的临床和人口统计学预测因素:一项开放标签研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(6):385-405. doi: 10.2165/11588800-000000000-00000.
2
Duloxetine 60 mg once-daily in the treatment of painful physical symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克用于治疗重度抑郁症患者的疼痛性躯体症状。
J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.04.011.
3
Duloxetine in the long-term treatment of major depressive disorder.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的长期治疗。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;64(10):1237-44. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n1015.
4
A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of nonmajor chronic depression.度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗非重症慢性抑郁症的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):984-91. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07230.
5
Acute and long-term treatment of late-life major depressive disorder: duloxetine versus placebo.老年期重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:度洛西汀与安慰剂比较。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;22(1):34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
6
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in the treatment of pain in patients with major depressive disorder and at least moderate pain of unknown etiology: a randomized controlled trial.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克治疗重度抑郁症伴至少中度不明原因疼痛患者疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1707-16. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1110.
7
The effect of duloxetine on painful physical symptoms in depressed patients: do improvements in these symptoms result in higher remission rates?度洛西汀对抑郁症患者疼痛性躯体症状的影响:这些症状的改善是否会导致更高的缓解率?
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;65(4):521-30. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0411.
8
An 8-week, open-label trial of duloxetine for comorbid major depressive disorder and chronic headache.度洛西汀治疗共病的重度抑郁症和慢性头痛的8周开放标签试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;69(9):1449-54. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0912.
9
Anxiety does not predict response to duloxetine in major depression: results of a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 11 placebo-controlled trials.焦虑并不能预测度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症的疗效:来自 11 项安慰剂对照试验的个体患者数据汇总分析的结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2010;27(1):12-8. doi: 10.1002/da.20632.
10
Escitalopram and duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a pharmacoeconomic comparison using UK cost data.艾司西酞普兰和度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:一项使用英国成本数据的药物经济学比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(11):969-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of the effectiveness of an early medication change strategy in patients with major depressive disorder.预测早期药物调整策略对重度抑郁症患者疗效的影响因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2014-x.
2
Clinical factors predicting treatment resistant depression: affirmative results from the European multicenter study.临床因素预测治疗抵抗性抑郁症:来自欧洲多中心研究的阳性结果。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Jan;139(1):78-88. doi: 10.1111/acps.12959. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
3
Pharmacologic treatment of dimensional anxious depression: a review.

本文引用的文献

1
Duloxetine in acute major depression: review of comparisons to placebo and standard antidepressants using dissimilar methods.度洛西汀治疗急性重度抑郁症:使用不同方法与安慰剂和标准抗抑郁药比较的综述
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;24(3):177-90. doi: 10.1002/hup.1005.
2
Early symptom change prediction of remission in depression treatment.抑郁症治疗中缓解期早期症状变化预测
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2009;42(1):94-107.
3
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.12种新一代抗抑郁药的疗效与可接受性比较:一项多治疗组元分析
维度性焦虑抑郁的药物治疗:综述
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014;16(3). doi: 10.4088/PCC.13r01621. Epub 2014 May 29.
Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):746-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60046-5.
4
Improving the prediction of treatment response in depression: integration of clinical, cognitive, psychophysiological, neuroimaging, and genetic measures.改善抑郁症治疗反应的预测:整合临床、认知、心理生理、神经影像学和基因测量方法。
CNS Spectr. 2008 Dec;13(12):1066-86; quiz 1087-8. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900017120.
5
Predictors, moderators, and mediators (correlates) of treatment outcome in major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症治疗结果的预测因素、调节因素和中介因素(相关因素)
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(4):439-51. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2008.10.4/gipapakostas.
6
Factors predicting reduced antidepressant response: experience with the SNRI duloxetine in patients with major depression.预测抗抑郁反应降低的因素:5-羟色胺与去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症患者的经验
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):209-18. doi: 10.1080/10401230802437639.
7
Review and meta-analysis of antidepressant pharmacogenetic findings in major depressive disorder.抗抑郁药治疗重性抑郁障碍的遗传药理学研究的回顾和荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2010 May;15(5):473-500. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.116. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
8
Predictors of relapse in a study of duloxetine treatment in patients with major depressive disorder.一项关于度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症患者复发预测因素的研究
J Affect Disord. 2009 Mar;113(3):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.05.023. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
9
Effectiveness of antidepressant treatments in pre-menopausal versus post-menopausal women: a pilot study on differential effects of sex hormones on antidepressant effects.抗抑郁治疗在绝经前与绝经后女性中的有效性:一项关于性激素对抗抑郁效果差异影响的初步研究。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2009 Mar;63(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2008.03.010. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
10
Gender issues in depression.抑郁症中的性别问题。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Oct-Dec;19(4):247-55. doi: 10.1080/10401230701653294.