• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

96小时无线pH监测的诊断率及其在患者管理中的效用。

Diagnostic yield of 96-h wireless pH monitoring and usefulness in patients' management.

作者信息

Grigolon Ausilia, Consonni Dario, Bravi Ivana, Tenca Andrea, Penagini Roberto

机构信息

Cattedra di Gastroenterologia, Università degli Studi and Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;46(5):522-30. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.545834. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

DOI:10.3109/00365521.2010.545834
PMID:21366495
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To get insight into usefulness of 96-h wireless monitoring in diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and in patients' management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

51 patients who underwent 96-h wireless and 51 matched patients who underwent 24-h traditional pH monitoring were enrolled and retrospectively contacted with a structured telephone interview.

RESULTS

In the wireless group, the 96-h recording improved (p < 0.05) the diagnostic yield compared with the first 48-h recording by allowing Symptom Association Probability to be measured in eight more patients and by decreasing indeterminate tests from 11 to 5. After pH monitoring, concordance between results of the test and treatment for GERD was higher in the wireless compared with the traditional group, 78% versus 58% of the patients (p < 0.05). Both improvement/disappearance of the clinically relevant symptom and satisfaction (score of 1-10) at time of the telephone interview were however similar in the two groups, 73% versus 65% and 7.0 versus 6.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Wireless pH monitoring prolonged to 96 h increased the likelihood to exclude/confirm GERD as the cause of the clinically relevant symptoms in those patients with an indeterminate result for GERD after the first 48 h. Outcome was however similar to the one of traditional pH monitoring.

摘要

目的

深入了解96小时无线监测在胃食管反流病(GERD)诊断及患者管理中的作用。

材料与方法

纳入51例接受96小时无线监测的患者以及51例匹配的接受24小时传统pH监测的患者,并通过结构化电话访谈进行回顾性联系。

结果

在无线监测组中,与最初48小时记录相比,96小时记录提高了(p < 0.05)诊断率,使得另外8例患者能够进行症状关联概率测量,并将不确定测试从11例减少至5例。pH监测后,无线监测组中GERD测试结果与治疗的一致性高于传统监测组,患者分别为78%和58%(p < 0.05)。然而,两组在电话访谈时临床相关症状的改善/消失情况以及满意度(1 - 10分)相似,分别为73%对65%以及7.0对6.5。

结论

将无线pH监测延长至96小时增加了在最初48小时GERD结果不确定的患者中排除/确认GERD为临床相关症状病因的可能性。然而,结果与传统pH监测相似。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic yield of 96-h wireless pH monitoring and usefulness in patients' management.96小时无线pH监测的诊断率及其在患者管理中的效用。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;46(5):522-30. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2010.545834. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
2
24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.24 小时与 48 小时 Bravo pH 监测。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;46(3):197-200. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f3c4f.
3
A prospective study to compare a symptom-based reflux disease questionnaire to 48-h wireless pH monitoring for the identification of gastroesophageal reflux (revised 2-26-11).一项前瞻性研究比较基于症状的反流病问卷与 48 小时无线 pH 监测在胃食管反流病诊断中的作用(修订于 2011 年 2 月 26 日)。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;106(9):1604-11. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.180. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
4
Comparison of wireless 48-h (Bravo) versus traditional ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring.无线48小时(Bravo)与传统动态24小时食管pH监测的比较。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(3):276-83. doi: 10.1080/00365520802588109.
5
Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.食管酸暴露接近胃食管交界处的测量对诊断准确性和事件-症状相关性的影响:使用无线双 pH 监测的前瞻性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec;104(12):2918-25. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.506. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
6
Prolonged, wireless pH-studies have a high diagnostic yield in patients with reflux symptoms and negative 24-h catheter-based pH-studies.对于有反流症状且 24 小时基于导管 pH 研究为阴性的患者,长时间、无线 pH 研究具有较高的诊断收益。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 May;23(5):419-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01663.x. Epub 2011 Jan 16.
7
Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with therapy-resistant reflux symptoms: 'on' or 'off' proton pump inhibitor?对难治性反流症状患者进行食管pH阻抗监测:质子泵抑制剂是“服用”还是“停用”?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;103(10):2446-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02033.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
8
Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?无线胶囊pH监测:它是否满足所有期望?
Digestion. 2007;76(3-4):235-40. doi: 10.1159/000112796. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
9
The impact of prolonged pH measurements on the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-day wireless pH studies.延长pH测量对胃食管反流病诊断的影响:为期4天的无线pH研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec;102(12):2642-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01461.x. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
10
[Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease-related noncardiac chest pain].[胃食管反流病相关非心源性胸痛的诊断]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 May 27;88(20):1390-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen fundoplication in the management of GERD.抗胃食管反流磁压迫术与 Nissen 胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病的对比研究。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2367-2374. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03172-z. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
2
Lower oesophageal sphincter identification for gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: The step-up method revisited with use of basal impedance.食管下括约肌识别用于胃食管反流监测:使用基础阻抗重新探讨逐步升级方法。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Dec;7(10):1373-1379. doi: 10.1177/2050640619860034. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for oesophageal manometry and oesophageal reflux monitoring.
英国胃肠病学会食管测压和食管反流监测指南。
Gut. 2019 Oct;68(10):1731-1750. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318115. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Trajectory assessment is useful when day-to-day esophageal acid exposure varies in prolonged wireless pH monitoring.在长时间无线 pH 监测中,当日常食管酸暴露情况发生变化时,轨迹评估是有用的。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Mar 1;32(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy077.
5
Yield of prolonged wireless pH monitoring in achalasia patients successfully treated with pneumatic dilation.经气囊扩张成功治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者延长无线pH监测的结果
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Oct;5(6):789-795. doi: 10.1177/2050640616681366. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
6
pH Impedance vs. traditional pH monitoring in clinical practice: an outcome study.临床实践中pH阻抗监测与传统pH监测的比较:一项结果研究。
J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;51(2):130-7. doi: 10.1007/s00535-015-1090-z. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
7
Inconsistency in the Diagnosis of Functional Heartburn: Usefulness of Prolonged Wireless pH Monitoring in Patients With Proton Pump Inhibitor Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.功能性烧心诊断的不一致性:长时间无线pH监测在质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病患者中的应用价值
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Mar 30;21(2):265-72. doi: 10.5056/jnm14075.
8
24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring may be an inadequate test for detecting gastroesophageal reflux in patients with mixed typical and atypical symptoms.对于具有典型和非典型混合症状的患者,24小时多通道腔内阻抗-pH监测可能不是检测胃食管反流的充分测试。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):1700-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3867-1. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
9
Clinical utility and tolerability of JSPH-1 wireless esophageal pH monitoring system.JSPH-1 无线食管 pH 监测系统的临床实用性和耐受性。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 15;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-10.