一项喹硫平和帕罗西汀作为成人双相抑郁单药治疗的双盲、安慰剂对照研究(EMBOLDEN II)。

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine and paroxetine as monotherapy in adults with bipolar depression (EMBOLDEN II).

机构信息

Lindner Center of HOPE Research Institute, Mason, OH 45040, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;71(2):163-74. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04942gre. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine and paroxetine monotherapy for major depression in bipolar disorder.

METHOD

740 patients (478 bipolar I, 262 bipolar II) with major depressive episodes (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to quetiapine 300 mg/d (n = 245), quetiapine 600 mg/d (n = 247), paroxetine 20 mg/d (n = 122), or placebo (n = 126) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the change from baseline in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The study was conducted from May 2005 to May 2007.

RESULTS

Mean MADRS score change from baseline at 8 weeks was -16.19 for quetiapine 300 mg, -16.31 for quetiapine 600 mg, -13.76 for paroxetine, and -12.60 for placebo (P < .001 for both quetiapine doses, P = .313 for paroxetine, vs placebo). Quetiapine-treated (both doses), but not paroxetine-treated, patients showed significantly greater improvements (P < or = .05) in most secondary outcomes measures at week 8 versus the placebo group. Paroxetine significantly improved Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores versus placebo (P < .05) but not MADRS or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores. Both quetiapine doses were associated with greater improvements than paroxetine for MADRS and HDRS scores. The most common adverse events were dry mouth, somnolence, sedation, and dizziness with quetiapine (both doses) and dry mouth, sedation, headache, insomnia, and nausea with paroxetine. The incidence of treatment-emergent mania/hypomania was lower with quetiapine compared with paroxetine and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine (300 or 600 mg/d), but not paroxetine, was more effective than placebo for treating acute depressive episodes in bipolar I and II disorder. Quetiapine treatment was generally well tolerated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00119652.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估喹硫平和帕罗西汀单药治疗双相障碍中重性抑郁发作的疗效和耐受性。

方法

740 例重性抑郁发作患者(478 例单相 I 型,262 例单相 II 型)被随机分配至喹硫平 300mg/d(n=245)、喹硫平 600mg/d(n=247)、帕罗西汀 20mg/d(n=122)或安慰剂(n=126)组,治疗 8 周。主要终点为从基线起的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分变化。研究于 2005 年 5 月至 2007 年 5 月进行。

结果

治疗 8 周时,喹硫平 300mg 组、喹硫平 600mg 组、帕罗西汀组和安慰剂组的 MADRS 总分从基线的平均变化分别为-16.19、-16.31、-13.76 和-12.60(喹硫平两组剂量 P<0.001,帕罗西汀与安慰剂 P=0.313)。喹硫平治疗组(两组剂量)而非帕罗西汀治疗组在第 8 周时在大多数次要终点评估上显示出显著更大的改善(P<0.05),与安慰剂组相比。帕罗西汀显著改善了汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分(P<0.05),但未改善 MADRS 或汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)评分。与帕罗西汀相比,两种喹硫平剂量对 MADRS 和 HDRS 评分的改善作用更大。喹硫平(两组剂量)最常见的不良反应是口干、嗜睡、镇静和头晕,帕罗西汀为口干、镇静、头痛、失眠和恶心。与帕罗西汀和安慰剂相比,喹硫平治疗后出现转躁或轻躁狂的发生率更低。

结论

喹硫平(300 或 600mg/d)而非帕罗西汀治疗双相 I 型和 II 型障碍急性抑郁发作比安慰剂更有效。喹硫平治疗总体上耐受性良好。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00119652。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索