Porwancher Richard B, Hagerty C Greg, Fan Jianqing, Landsberg Lisa, Johnson Barbara J B, Kopnitsky Mark, Steere Allen C, Kulas Karen, Wong Susan J
Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 May;18(5):851-9. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00409-10. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends a 2-tier serologic approach to Lyme disease laboratory diagnosis, comprised of an initial serum enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi followed by supplementary IgG and IgM Western blotting of EIA-positive or -equivocal samples. Western blot accuracy is limited by subjective interpretation of weakly positive bands, false-positive IgM immunoblots, and low sensitivity for detection of early disease. We developed an objective alternative second-tier immunoassay using a multiplex microsphere system that measures VlsE1-IgG and pepC10-IgM antibodies simultaneously in the same sample. Our study population comprised 79 patients with early acute Lyme disease, 82 patients with early-convalescent-phase disease, 47 patients with stage II and III disease, 34 patients post-antibiotic treatment, and 794 controls. A bioinformatic technique called partial receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) regression was used to combine individual antibody levels into a single diagnostic score with a single cutoff; this technique enhances test performance when a high specificity is required (e.g., ≥ 95%). Compared to Western blotting, the multiplex assay was equally specific (95.6%) but 20.7% more sensitive for early-convalescent-phase disease (89.0% versus 68.3%, respectively; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] for difference, 12.1% to 30.9%) and 12.5% more sensitive overall (75.0% versus 62.5%, respectively; 95% CI for difference, 8.1% to 17.1%). As a second-tier test, a multiplex assay for VlsE1-IgG and pepC10-IgM antibodies performed as well as or better than Western blotting for Lyme disease diagnosis. Prospective validation studies appear to be warranted.
美国疾病控制与预防中心目前推荐采用两级血清学方法进行莱姆病的实验室诊断,该方法包括先用血清酶免疫测定法(EIA)检测抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体,然后对EIA检测呈阳性或疑似阳性的样本进行补充性IgG和IgM免疫印迹分析。免疫印迹的准确性受到弱阳性条带主观判读、IgM免疫印迹假阳性以及早期疾病检测灵敏度低的限制。我们开发了一种客观的替代性二级免疫测定法,该方法使用多重微球系统,可在同一样本中同时检测VlsE1-IgG和pepC10-IgM抗体。我们的研究对象包括79例早期急性莱姆病患者、82例疾病早期恢复期患者、47例II期和III期疾病患者、34例抗生素治疗后患者以及794名对照者。一种名为部分受试者工作特征(ROC)回归的生物信息学技术被用于将个体抗体水平合并为具有单一临界值的单一诊断评分;当需要高特异性(如≥95%)时,该技术可提高检测性能。与免疫印迹法相比,多重检测法的特异性相同(95.6%),但对疾病早期恢复期的检测灵敏度提高了20.7%(分别为89.0%和68.3%;差异的95%置信区间[95%CI]为12.1%至30.9%),总体检测灵敏度提高了12.5%(分别为75.0%和62.5%;差异的95%CI为8.1%至17.1%)。作为二级检测方法,用于检测VlsE1-IgG和pepC10-IgM抗体的多重检测法在莱姆病诊断中的表现与免疫印迹法相当或更好。前瞻性验证研究似乎很有必要。