Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌症患者心理结局干预措施的证据:文献系统评价。

Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul;19(7):871-81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1119-7. Epub 2011 Mar 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In addition to cancer-related distress, people with head and neck cancer (HNC) endure facial disfigurement and difficulties with eating and communication. High rates of alcohol use and socio-economic disadvantage raise concerns that patients with HNC may be less likely than others to participate in and adhere to psychological interventions. This article aims to inform future practice and research by reviewing the evidence in support of psychological interventions for this patient group.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in December 2009. Relevant studies were rated for internal and external validity against the criteria of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) US Preventive Services Task Force. Wherever possible, outcomes were evaluated using effect sizes to confirm statistically significant results and enable comparison between studies. Meta-analysis was planned according to criteria in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Levels of evidence for each intervention type were evaluated using AHRQ criteria.

RESULTS

Nine studies met inclusion criteria. One study was rated 'good' for internal validity and four for external validity. Psycho-education and/or cognitive-behavioural therapy were evaluated by seven studies, and communication skills training and a support group by one study each. Significant heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Based on a study-by-study review, there was most support for psycho-education, with three out of five studies finding at least some effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Research to date suggests it is feasible to recruit people with HNC to psychological interventions and to evaluate their progress through repeated-outcome measures. Evidence for interventions is limited by the small number of studies, methodological problems, and poor comparability. Future interventions should target HNC patients who screen positive for clinical distress and be integrated into standard care.

摘要

目的

除了与癌症相关的痛苦外,头颈部癌症(HNC)患者还会经历容貌损毁以及进食和交流困难。高比例的酒精使用和社会经济劣势使人担心 HNC 患者可能比其他人更少参与和坚持心理干预。本文旨在通过回顾支持该患者群体的心理干预的证据,为未来的实践和研究提供信息。

方法

我们于 2009 年 12 月检索了 CENTRAL、Medline、Embase、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL。根据美国医疗保健研究与质量机构(AHRQ)美国预防服务工作组的标准,对内部和外部有效性进行了相关研究评估。在可能的情况下,使用效应量评估结果,以确认统计学上的显著结果,并使研究之间能够进行比较。根据 Cochrane 系统评价手册的标准,计划进行荟萃分析。使用 AHRQ 标准评估每种干预类型的证据水平。

结果

9 项研究符合纳入标准。有 1 项研究的内部有效性被评为“良好”,4 项研究的外部有效性被评为“良好”。7 项研究评估了心理教育和/或认知行为疗法,1 项研究评估了沟通技巧培训和支持小组。显著的异质性使荟萃分析无法进行。根据一项研究的回顾,心理教育最受支持,五项研究中有三项发现了至少一些效果。

结论

迄今为止的研究表明,招募 HNC 患者参加心理干预并通过重复的结果测量评估他们的进展是可行的。干预的证据受到研究数量少、方法学问题和可比性差的限制。未来的干预措施应针对筛查出有临床痛苦的 HNC 患者,并将其纳入标准护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验