Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Level 5, 119-143 Missenden Rd, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050, Australia.
University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4055-4067. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04979-8. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) affects 50-70% of cancer survivors. Evidence-based psychological interventions for FCR are effective but resource-/time-consuming. This systematic review identified interventions by non-mental health specialists addressing FCR, evidence of a relationship between specialist communication and FCR and stakeholder perspectives on how specialist communication can address FCR.
A systematic literature review was conducted using nine databases (Medline Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, PsychINFO, Informit, Web of Science and Google Scholar). Included studies were English, published 1997-2018, on adult cancer patients examining 'fear'/'worry' and 'cancer recurrence'/'progression' and 'health communication'/'medical encounter'/'interventions'. Data was extracted, summarised and rated for quality by two authors.
Of 6248 articles screened, 16 were included. No phase III randomised controlled trials were found. Five studies piloted an intervention, three were correlational studies, five were cross-sectional patient surveys and three were specialist surveys. Four out of five interventional studies were nurse-led: one trained patients in discussing FCR with their specialist while three delivered supportive counselling and/or taught strategies to manage FCR. The last intervention trained mixed health professionals to manage FCR through normalisation, education and lifestyle strategies. Three intervention studies measured FCR objectively, and two demonstrated a reduction in FCR in the short term. Consultation duration, empathy and clear information delivery were associated with FCR. Patients indicated desire to discuss FCR; however, specialists indicated discomfort with managing FCR.
Research on non-mental health practitioner-led interventions to address FCR is lacking. Further studies on whether specialist interventions delivered during follow-up consultations are useful in managing FCR are required.
癌症复发恐惧(FCR)影响 50-70%的癌症幸存者。针对 FCR 的基于证据的心理干预措施是有效的,但需要耗费大量资源和时间。本系统评价确定了非心理健康专家针对 FCR 开展的干预措施,以及专家沟通与 FCR 之间的关系的证据,以及利益相关者对专家沟通如何解决 FCR 的看法。
使用 9 个数据库(Medline Ovid、EMBASE、Cochrane、CINAHL、Scopus、PsychINFO、Informit、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar)进行系统文献综述。纳入的研究为英语,发表于 1997-2018 年,针对成年癌症患者,研究内容包括“恐惧”/“担忧”和“癌症复发”/“进展”以及“健康沟通”/“医疗接触”/“干预措施”。两位作者对数据进行提取、总结和质量评估。
在筛选出的 6248 篇文章中,有 16 篇被纳入。未发现 III 期随机对照试验。五项研究初步试验了干预措施,三项为相关性研究,五项为横断面患者调查,三项为专家调查。五项干预研究中有四项由护士主导:一项培训患者与专家讨论 FCR,三项提供支持性咨询和/或教授管理 FCR 的策略。最后一项干预措施培训了混合医疗专业人员,通过正常化、教育和生活方式策略来管理 FCR。三项干预研究客观地测量了 FCR,其中两项在短期内降低了 FCR。咨询时间、同理心和清晰的信息传递与 FCR 有关。患者表示希望讨论 FCR;然而,专家表示对管理 FCR 感到不适。
针对非心理健康从业者主导的干预措施以解决 FCR 的研究还很缺乏。需要进一步研究在随访咨询中提供的专家干预措施是否有助于管理 FCR。