• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证风险评分模型预测溶栓后颅内出血的效果。

Validation assessment of risk scores to predict postthrombolysis intracerebral haemorrhage.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2011 Apr;6(2):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00556.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00556.x
PMID:21371270
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two clinical risk scores, the Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis and Multicentre Stroke Survey scores, have been proposed to predict the risk of intracerebral haemorrhage following thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke.

AIMS

To validate Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis and Multicentre Stroke Survey scores as predictors of post-tissue plasminogen activator symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and asymptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage in an independent cohort.

METHODS

Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis and Multicentre Stroke Survey scores were calculated for the cohort of tissue plasminogen activator-treated patients enrolled in the placebo arms of the SAINT-I and SAINT-II trials. The absolute risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and asymptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage associated with each scoring system was determined. The overall predictive value was assessed using c-statistics.

RESULTS

Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage occurred in 5.6% of 965 patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator in the SAINT cohorts. The risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage was modestly greater, with higher Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis scores (0: 4.1%, 1: 4.1%, 2: 8.8%, 3: 12.5%, 4: 0%, 5: no subjects). Similar results were seen with the Multicentre Stroke Survey score (0: 0%, 1: 4.8%, 2: 2.3%, 3: 7.3%, 4: 6.3%). In logistic regression, the Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis score was associated with the risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (odds ratio = 1.41 per point, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.89, P = 0.021) and asymptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (odds ratio = 1.59 per point, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.92, P< 0.001). The Multicentre Stroke Survey score was modestly associated with the risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (odds ratio = 1.43 per point, 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.15, P = 0.084) and asymptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (odds ratio = 1.63 per point, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-2.08, P < 0.001). The c-statistic was 0.59 for predicting symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and 0.61 for asymptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage for both the Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis and the Multicentre Stroke Survey scores.

CONCLUSIONS

While both the Haemorrhage After Thrombolysis and Multicentre Stroke Survey scores were associated with a risk of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, discriminatory ability was limited.

摘要

背景

有两种临床风险评分,即溶栓后出血和多中心卒中调查评分,用于预测急性缺血性卒中溶栓后颅内出血的风险。

目的

在独立队列中验证溶栓后出血和多中心卒中调查评分对组织型纤溶酶原激活物治疗患者的症状性颅内出血和无症状性颅内出血的预测作用。

方法

计算了组织型纤溶酶原激活物治疗的 SAINT-I 和 SAINT-II 试验安慰剂组患者的溶栓后出血和多中心卒中调查评分。确定了每个评分系统与症状性颅内出血和无症状性颅内出血相关的绝对风险。使用 C 统计量评估整体预测价值。

结果

SAINT 队列中,965 例接受组织型纤溶酶原激活物治疗的患者中,有 5.6%发生症状性颅内出血。溶栓后出血评分较高的患者,其发生症状性颅内出血的风险也较高(0:4.1%,1:4.1%,2:8.8%,3:12.5%,4:0%,5:无患者)。多中心卒中调查评分也出现了类似的结果(0:0%,1:4.8%,2:2.3%,3:7.3%,4:6.3%)。在逻辑回归中,溶栓后出血评分与症状性颅内出血的风险相关(比值比=每点 1.41,95%置信区间:1.05-1.89,P=0.021)和无症状性颅内出血(比值比=每点 1.59,95%置信区间:1.33-1.92,P<0.001)。多中心卒中调查评分与症状性颅内出血的风险中度相关(比值比=每点 1.43,95%置信区间:0.95-2.15,P=0.084)和无症状性颅内出血(比值比=每点 1.63,95%置信区间:1.27-2.08,P<0.001)。溶栓后出血和多中心卒中调查评分预测症状性颅内出血的 C 统计量分别为 0.59 和 0.61,预测无症状性颅内出血的 C 统计量分别为 0.59 和 0.61。

结论

尽管溶栓后出血和多中心卒中调查评分均与症状性颅内出血风险相关,但区分能力有限。

相似文献

1
Validation assessment of risk scores to predict postthrombolysis intracerebral haemorrhage.验证风险评分模型预测溶栓后颅内出血的效果。
Int J Stroke. 2011 Apr;6(2):109-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00556.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Thrombolysis for stroke: policy should be based on science, and not on politics, money or fear of malpractice.中风的溶栓治疗:政策应基于科学,而非政治、金钱或对医疗事故的恐惧。
Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Jun;18(3):215-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00845.x.
3
Does dementia increase risk of thrombolysis?: a case-control study.痴呆是否会增加溶栓治疗的风险?一项病例对照研究。
Neurology. 2011 May 3;76(18):1575-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182190d37. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
4
Hemorrhagic complications of thrombolytic therapy.溶栓治疗的出血并发症
Med Pregl. 2012 Jan-Feb;65(1-2):9-12.
5
Combined anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel: risk factor for thrombolysis-related intracerebral hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke?阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合抗血小板治疗:急性缺血性卒中溶栓相关脑出血的危险因素?
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Sep 15;284(1-2):155-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 May 26.
6
Comparison of combined venous and arterial thrombolysis with primary arterial therapy using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中中联合静脉和动脉溶栓与使用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂进行原发性动脉治疗的比较。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2007.12.004.
7
Ischaemic stroke: acute-phase drug therapy. Mostly aspirin and heparin.缺血性中风:急性期药物治疗。主要是阿司匹林和肝素。
Prescrire Int. 2005 Aug;14(78):146-52.
8
Safety of antiplatelet therapy prior to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓前抗血小板治疗的安全性
Arch Neurol. 2008 May;65(5):607-11. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.5.noc70077. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
9
Intravenous thrombolysis is feasible and safe in multiethnic Asian stroke patients in Singapore.静脉溶栓在新加坡多民族亚洲中风患者中是可行且安全的。
Int J Stroke. 2009 Oct;4(5):320-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00325.x.
10
Thrombolysis risk prediction: applying the SITS-SICH and SEDAN scores in South African patients.溶栓风险预测:在南非患者中应用SITS-SICH和SEDAN评分
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2014 Sep-Oct;25(5):224-7. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2014-043.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional and machine learning models for predicting haemorrhagic transformation in ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测缺血性卒中出血转化的传统模型和机器学习模型:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 22;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02771-w.
2
Therapies for Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中出血转化的治疗方法
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017 Jan;19(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11940-017-0438-5.
3
Comparison of 8 scores for predicting symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after IV thrombolysis.
静脉溶栓后预测症状性脑出血的8种评分方法的比较。
Neurocrit Care. 2015 Apr;22(2):229-33. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0060-2.
4
Predicting outcomes after transient ischemic attack and stroke.预测短暂性脑缺血发作和中风后的预后。
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2014 Apr;20(2 Cerebrovascular Disease):412-28. doi: 10.1212/01.CON.0000446110.97667.58.
5
Does preexisting antiplatelet treatment influence postthrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage in community-treated ischemic stroke patients? An observational study.社区治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者中,预先存在的抗血小板治疗是否会影响溶栓后颅内出血?一项观察性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):146-54. doi: 10.1111/acem.12077.
6
Clinical predictors and management of hemorrhagic transformation.出血性转化的临床预测因素和管理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2013 Apr;15(2):125-49. doi: 10.1007/s11940-012-0217-2.
7
Stroke: Haemorrhage risk after thrombolysis--the SEDAN score.中风:溶栓后的出血风险——SEDAN评分
Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Apr 17;8(5):246-7. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.66.