Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
From individual randomized studies, it is not clear whether a closed suction drainage should be used after total knee arthroplasty. Our meta-analysis compares the clinical outcomes of closed suction drainage with nondrainage after total knee arthroplasty in randomized controlled trials reported between January 1966 and May 2010. Fifteen eligible trials involving 1361 knee incisions (686 knees with closed suction drainage and 675 knees without drainage) satisfied the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. The result of the meta-analysis indicates that closed suction drainage reduces the incidence of soft tissue ecchymosis and requirement for dressing reinforcement, but increases the rate of homologous blood transfusion. No significant difference between drainage and nondrainage was observed in the incidence of infection, deep venous thrombosis, or postoperative range of motion.
从个体随机研究来看,全膝关节置换术后是否使用密闭式引流尚不清楚。我们的荟萃分析比较了 1966 年 1 月至 2010 年 5 月期间报告的随机对照试验中全膝关节置换术后使用密闭式引流和不引流的临床结果。15 项符合纳入标准的试验共涉及 1361 个膝关节切口(686 个膝关节使用密闭式引流,675 个膝关节未引流)。荟萃分析结果表明,密闭式引流可降低软组织瘀斑和敷料加固的发生率,但会增加同种异体输血的发生率。引流和不引流在感染、深静脉血栓形成或术后活动范围方面无显著差异。