Vermont Lung Center, Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 May;110(5):1319-26. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01364.2010. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Variable (or noisy) ventilation (VV) has been demonstrated in animal models of acute lung injury to be superior to constant (or conventional) ventilation (CV), in terms of improved gas exchange and mitigation of lung injury, for reasons that are not entirely clear. We hypothesized that the efficacy of VV is related to the fact that recruitment and derecruitment of lung units are dynamic processes. To test this hypothesis, we modeled the lung computationally as a symmetrically bifurcating airway tree terminating in elastic units. Each airway was fully open or completely closed, at any point in time, according to its pressure history. The model is able to accurately mimic previous experimental measurements showing that the lungs of mice injured by acid aspiration are better recruited after 60 min of VV than CV. The model also shows that recruitment/derecruitment dynamics contribute to the relative efficacy of VV, provided lung units open more rapidly than they close once a critical opening or closing pressure threshold has been crossed. We conclude that the dynamics of recruitment and derecruitment in the lung may be important factors responsible for the benefits of VV compared with CV.
变异性(或噪声性)通气(VV)已在急性肺损伤的动物模型中得到证实,与常规通气(CV)相比,VV 在改善气体交换和减轻肺损伤方面更具优势,但其具体原因尚不完全清楚。我们假设 VV 的疗效与肺单位的复张和去复张是动态过程这一事实有关。为了验证这一假设,我们将肺通过计算机建模为一个对称分支的气道树,终止于弹性单元。根据气道的压力历史,每个气道在任何时候都完全打开或完全关闭。该模型能够准确模拟先前的实验测量结果,表明在酸吸入损伤后的小鼠中,VV 通气 60 分钟后比 CV 通气能更好地复张。该模型还表明,一旦跨越了临界开放或关闭压力阈值,开放和关闭的速度更快,复张/去复张的动力学对 VV 的相对疗效有贡献。我们得出结论,肺的复张和去复张的动力学可能是 VV 与 CV 相比具有优势的重要因素。