Forgiarini Junior Luiz Alberto, Forgiarini Luiz Felipe, Paludo Arthur de Oliveira, Mariano Rodrigo, de Moraes Mikael Marcelo, Felix Elaine Aparecida, Andrade Cristiano Feijó
Universidade Católica de Pelotas (UCPel), Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis (Uniritter), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Pneumológicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):844576. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844576. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
This study aims to compare the use of variable mechanical ventilation with conventional mechanical ventilation in a porcine model of ARDS induced by oleic acid.
The animals were divided into two groups (n = 6), Conventional Ventilation (CO) and variable ventilation with Bi-Oscillatory PEEP (BiPEEP). ARDS was induced using intravenous oleic acid (0.15 mL.kg). After, the animals were evaluated during 180 minutes and, measurements were taken every 30 minutes until the end of the observation period. The animals in the CO group were then ventilated under controlled pressure (Tidal Volume target at 6 mL.kg) and 5 cm HO PEEP. Variable ventilation was characterized by the oscillation of PEEP from 5 to 10 cm HO every 4 respiratory cycles. Ventilatory, hemodynamic parameters, oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes, Interleukin 8 (IL8) and 17-a (IL17a) were evaluated. Histological samples were collected from the upper and the lower portion of the left lungs and analyzed separately.
BiPEEP improved lung compliance and PaO in comparison to control (p < 0.05). The levels of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes showed no significant difference. There was no difference in IL17a between groups. IL8 was significantly increased in the lung base of CO group in relation to BiPEEP group and it was reduced in the apex of BiPEEP group in comparsion to CO group. The BiPEEP group showed less changes in histopathological patterns.
Variable ventilation with bi-oscillatory level of PEEP demonstrated a potential ventilatory strategy for lung protection in an experimental model of ARDS.
本研究旨在比较在油酸诱导的猪急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)模型中,可变机械通气与传统机械通气的使用情况。
将动物分为两组(n = 6),即传统通气组(CO)和双振荡呼气末正压通气(BiPEEP)可变通气组。通过静脉注射油酸(0.15 mL·kg)诱导ARDS。之后,在180分钟内对动物进行评估,每隔30分钟进行一次测量,直至观察期结束。然后,CO组动物在控制压力下通气(潮气量目标为6 mL·kg),呼气末正压为5 cmH₂O。可变通气的特点是每4个呼吸周期呼气末正压从5 cmH₂O振荡至10 cmH₂O。评估通气、血流动力学参数、氧化应激、抗氧化酶、白细胞介素8(IL8)和白细胞介素17-a(IL17a)。从左肺的上部和下部收集组织学样本并分别进行分析。
与对照组相比,BiPEEP改善了肺顺应性和动脉血氧分压(p < 0.05)。氧化应激水平和抗氧化酶水平无显著差异。两组之间IL17a无差异。与BiPEEP组相比,CO组肺底部的IL8显著升高,与CO组相比,BiPEEP组肺尖部的IL8降低。BiPEEP组组织病理学模式变化较小。
在ARDS实验模型中,双振荡水平的呼气末正压可变通气显示出一种潜在的肺保护通气策略。