• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依那普利与硝苯地平控释片治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的随机双盲治疗试验

[A randomized double-blind therapeutic trial of enalapril versus timed-release nifedipine in mild to moderate essential hypertension].

作者信息

Artigou J Y, Benichou M, Berland J, Fressinaud P, Grollier G, Guéret P, Nguyen Cong Duc L

机构信息

Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtriére, Paris.

出版信息

Presse Med. 1990;19(1):13-6.

PMID:2137218
Abstract

In a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-placebo therapeutic trial, the effectiveness and safety of enalapril and slow-release nifedipine were studied in two groups of ambulatory patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Following a 2-week placebo period, 136 patients were allocated at random to either enalapril 20 mg/day in one evening dose (group 1, n = 68) or to nifedipine 40 mg/day in two doses, one a.m. the other p.m. (group II). Each treatment was administered for 12 weeks. Patients in both groups whose diastolic arterial pressure remained above 90 mmHg were given hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg/day from the 4th week onward. When blood pressure did not return to normal, the dose of hydrochlorothiazide was increased to 50 mg/day in the 8th week. After 4 weeks of treatment, no significant difference in reduction of supine diastolic arterial pressure was observed between the two groups (- 12.1 +/- 9.9 mmHg in groups I vs - 10.3 +/- 9.0 mmHg in group II). At the end of the 12-week treatment the decrease of diastolic blood pressure was more pronounced in patients on enalapril than in those on nifedipine (- 16.3 +/- 8.0 mmHg vs - 13.9 +/- 7.1 mmHg), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). The number of patients with undesirable side-effects was greater in the nifedipine group (33 patients; 48.5 per cent) than in the enalapril group (18 patients; 26.5 per cent). Treatment was discontinued on account of side-effects in 3 patients of the enalapril group and 10 patients of the nifedipine group.

摘要

在一项多中心、随机、双盲、双安慰剂治疗试验中,对两组轻至中度原发性高血压门诊患者研究了依那普利和硝苯地平缓释片的有效性和安全性。经过2周的安慰剂期后,136例患者被随机分为两组,一组为每晚服用依那普利20mg/天(第1组,n = 68),另一组为每日分两次服用硝苯地平40mg,一次上午服用,另一次下午服用(第II组)。每种治疗持续12周。两组中舒张压仍高于90mmHg的患者从第4周起给予氢氯噻嗪25mg/天。如果血压未恢复正常,则在第8周将氢氯噻嗪剂量增加至50mg/天。治疗4周后,两组间仰卧位舒张压降低无显著差异(第1组为-12.1±9.9mmHg,第II组为-10.3±9.0mmHg)。在12周治疗结束时,依那普利组患者的舒张压下降比硝苯地平组更明显(-16.3±8.0mmHg对-13.9±7.1mmHg),尽管差异无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。硝苯地平组出现不良副作用的患者数量(33例患者;48.5%)多于依那普利组(18例患者;26.5%)。依那普利组有3例患者、硝苯地平组有10例患者因副作用而停药。

相似文献

1
[A randomized double-blind therapeutic trial of enalapril versus timed-release nifedipine in mild to moderate essential hypertension].依那普利与硝苯地平控释片治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的随机双盲治疗试验
Presse Med. 1990;19(1):13-6.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The Enalapril vs Nifedipine French Study Group.依那普利与硝苯地平缓释片治疗轻至中度高血压患者的疗效及安全性比较。依那普利与硝苯地平法国研究组
Drugs. 1990;39 Suppl 2:67-72. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199000392-00013.
3
Lisinopril versus slow-release nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: a multicentre study. The Cooperative Study Group.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度高血压的多中心研究。协作研究组
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:29-33.
4
Efficacy and safety of enalapril versus extended-release nifedipine for the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension: a multicenter 22-week study. Multicenter Cooperative Study Group.依那普利与硝苯地平缓释片治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的疗效与安全性:一项为期22周的多中心研究。多中心合作研究组
Clin Ther. 1993 Nov-Dec;15(6):1094-107.
5
[Double blind randomized comparative study of two antihypertensive combinations. Enalapril-hydrochlorothiazide versus enalapril-nifedipine in 240 hypertensive patients resistant to monotherapy].两种抗高血压联合用药的双盲随机对照研究。依那普利-氢氯噻嗪与依那普利-硝苯地平治疗240例单药治疗无效的高血压患者的对比研究
Therapie. 1996 Jan-Feb;51(1):35-9.
6
Amlodipine with enalapril therapy in moderate-severe essential hypertension.氨氯地平联合依那普利治疗中重度原发性高血压
J Hum Hypertens. 1990 Oct;4(5):541-5.
7
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.
8
Antihypertensive efficacy of a slow release nifedipine tablet formulation given once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. A placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel-group trial.轻度至中度高血压患者每日服用一次硝苯地平缓释片制剂的降压疗效。一项安慰剂对照、双盲平行组试验。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1994 Feb;44(2):133-6.
9
Enalapril and enalapril-hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of essential hypertension. The Enalapril-Hydrochlorothiazide in Essential Hypertension Canadian Working Group.依那普利与依那普利-氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压。依那普利-氢氯噻嗪治疗原发性高血压加拿大工作组。
Clin Ther. 1993 Mar-Apr;15(2):364-73.
10
Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of lisinopril compared with nifedipine in patients with mild to severe essential hypertension.赖诺普利与硝苯地平对轻至重度原发性高血压患者降压效果的比较评估。
Angiology. 1992 Jun;43(6):482-9. doi: 10.1177/000331979204300605.

引用本文的文献

1
Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders.硝苯地平缓释制剂。对其在高血压、缺血性心脏病和周围血管疾病治疗中的当前用途及未来作用的评估。
Drugs. 1991 May;41(5):737-79. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199141050-00006.