Gueret P, Artigou J Y, Benichou M, Berland J, Fressinaud P, Grollier G, Nguyen C D
Department of Cardiology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Drugs. 1990;39 Suppl 2:67-72. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199000392-00013.
The long acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril was compared with the calcium channel blocker nifedipine as sustained-release formulation in 136 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. This multicentre study was carried out in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion by 28 cardiologists in private practice. After a 2-week placebo period, patients were randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups; the first group received enalapril 20 mg daily (n = 68), and the second group received sustained-release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (n = 68). The duration of treatment was 12 weeks. In both groups, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg was added at week 4 if diastolic blood pressure remained greater than 90 mm Hg. At week 8, if the target diastolic pressure of less than 90 mm Hg was not achieved, the dosage of hydrochlorothiazide was increased to 50mg. The clinical characteristics of the patients in each group were comparable. After 4 weeks of treatment, the reduction in supine diastolic blood pressure was similar in both groups (12.1 mm Hg in the enalapril group vs 10.3 mm Hg in the nifedipine group). Moreover, although the difference between the groups was more noticeable after 12 weeks of treatment (16.3 vs 13.9 mm Hg, respectively), it did not reach significance. The number of patients experiencing clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group than in the enalapril group [33 (48.5%) vs 18 (26.5%), respectively]. The most common complaints of patients administered nifedipine included swollen ankles, flushing and headaches, whereas complaints in the enalapril group included cough, asthenia, and epigastralgia. Three patients were withdrawn from the study because of side effects in the enalapril group and 10 were withdrawn from the nifedipine group. These results indicate that enalapril and sustained-release nifedipine are equally effective in controlling mild to moderate hypertension. However, enalapril was much better tolerated in this study.
将长效血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂依那普利与钙通道阻滞剂硝苯地平的缓释制剂用于136例轻至中度高血压患者,并进行了比较。这项多中心研究由28位私人执业心脏病专家以双盲、双模拟方式开展。经过2周的安慰剂期后,患者被随机分配至2个治疗组;第一组每日服用依那普利20mg(n = 68),第二组每日服用两次硝苯地平缓释片20mg(n = 68)。治疗持续时间为12周。两组中,如果舒张压在第4周时仍大于90mmHg,则加用氢氯噻嗪25mg。在第8周时,如果未达到目标舒张压低于90mmHg,则将氢氯噻嗪剂量增至50mg。每组患者的临床特征具有可比性。治疗4周后,两组仰卧位舒张压的降低幅度相似(依那普利组降低12.1mmHg,硝苯地平组降低10.3mmHg)。此外,尽管治疗12周后两组之间的差异更为明显(分别为16.3mmHg和13.9mmHg),但未达到显著水平。硝苯地平组出现临床不良反应的患者数量显著多于依那普利组[分别为33例(48.5%)和18例(26.5%)]。服用硝苯地平的患者最常见的主诉包括脚踝肿胀、面部潮红和头痛,而依那普利组的主诉包括咳嗽、乏力和上腹部疼痛。依那普利组有3例患者因副作用退出研究,硝苯地平组有10例患者退出。这些结果表明,依那普利和硝苯地平缓释制剂在控制轻至中度高血压方面同样有效。然而,在本研究中依那普利的耐受性要好得多。