Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1061-74. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820bfe8e. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Cardiac surgery is a high-risk procedure performed by a multidisciplinary team using complex tools and technologies. Efforts to improve cardiac surgery safety have been ongoing for more than a decade, yet the literature provides little guidance regarding best practices for identifying errors and improving patient safety. This focused review of the literature was undertaken as part of the FOCUS initiative (Flawless Operative Cardiovascular Unified Systems), a multifaceted effort supported by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Foundation to identify hazards and develop evidence-based protocols to improve cardiac surgery safety. Hazards were defined as anything that posed a potential or real risk to the patient, including errors, near misses, and adverse events. Of the 1438 articles identified for title review, 390 underwent full abstract screening, and 69 underwent full article review, which in turn yielded 55 meeting the inclusion criteria for this review. Two key themes emerged. First, studies were predominantly reactive (responding to an event or report) instead of proactive (using prospective designs such as self-assessments and external reviewers, etc.) and very few tested interventions. Second, minor events were predictive of major problems: multiple, often minor, deviations from normal procedures caused a cascade effect, resulting in major distractions that ultimately led to major events. This review fills an important gap in the literature on cardiac surgery safety, that of systematically identifying and categorizing known hazards according to their primary systemic contributor (or contributors). We conclude with recommendations for improving patient outcomes by building a culture of safety, promoting transparency, standardizing training, increasing teamwork, and monitoring performance. Finally, there is an urgent need for studies that evaluate interventions to mitigate the inherent risks of cardiac surgery.
心脏外科手术是一项高风险的程序,由多学科团队使用复杂的工具和技术进行。十多年来,人们一直在努力提高心脏外科手术的安全性,但文献对识别错误和提高患者安全性的最佳实践提供的指导很少。这篇重点文献回顾是 FOCUS 倡议(完美手术心血管统一系统)的一部分,该倡议是由心血管麻醉师协会基金会支持的多方面努力,旨在识别危害并制定基于证据的协议,以提高心脏外科手术的安全性。危害被定义为对患者构成潜在或实际风险的任何事物,包括错误、险些发生和不良事件。在对标题进行审查的 1438 篇文章中,有 390 篇进行了全文摘要筛选,有 69 篇进行了全文审查,其中有 55 篇符合本综述的纳入标准。有两个关键主题出现。首先,研究主要是反应性的(对事件或报告做出反应),而不是前瞻性的(使用自我评估和外部审查员等前瞻性设计),而且很少测试干预措施。其次,小事件预示着大问题:经常是多次偏离正常程序的小偏差会导致级联效应,从而导致重大干扰,最终导致重大事件。这篇综述填补了心脏外科手术安全性文献中的一个重要空白,即根据主要系统贡献者(或贡献者)系统地识别和分类已知危害。我们最后提出了通过建立安全文化、提高透明度、标准化培训、增加团队合作和监测绩效来改善患者结局的建议。最后,迫切需要研究评估干预措施以减轻心脏外科手术固有风险的研究。