Plumb J A
CRC Department of Medical Oncology, Beatson Laboratories, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Methods Mol Med. 1999;28:17-23. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-687-8:17.
The use of cell culture systems to assess the toxicity of anticancer agents began over 50 years ago following the observation of the antineoplastic effects of nitrogen mustard (1). There are a wide variety of assays designed to evaluate cellular drug sensitivity described in the literature. These assays essentially fall into two groups; those that measure cell survival and those that measure cytotoxicity. Cytotoxicity assays include methods such as trypan blue dye exclusion, (51)Cr release and (3)H-thymidine incorporation (2-4) and these assays assess the structural integrity and metabolic function of the cells following drug exposure. In contrast, cell survival assays measure the end result of these effects on the cell which can be either cell death or recovery. A cell survival assay thus requires a measure of the ability of cells to proliferate and this is usually an estimate of the ability of individual cells to form colonies. However, cytotoxicity assays can also measure the ability of cells to proliferate if the cells are allowed a period of growth following drug exposure. This recovery time is comparable to the time taken for formation of colonies in a clonogenic assay.
50多年前,在观察到氮芥的抗肿瘤作用后,人们开始使用细胞培养系统来评估抗癌药物的毒性(1)。文献中描述了各种各样用于评估细胞药物敏感性的检测方法。这些检测方法基本上可分为两类:一类是测量细胞存活率的方法,另一类是测量细胞毒性的方法。细胞毒性检测方法包括台盼蓝染料排斥法、(51)Cr释放法和(3)H-胸腺嘧啶核苷掺入法(2-4),这些方法用于评估药物作用后细胞的结构完整性和代谢功能。相比之下,细胞存活检测方法测量的是这些作用对细胞的最终结果,即细胞死亡或恢复。因此,细胞存活检测需要测量细胞增殖的能力,这通常是对单个细胞形成集落能力的估计。然而,如果在药物作用后给细胞一段生长时间,细胞毒性检测也可以测量细胞增殖的能力。这段恢复时间与克隆形成试验中形成集落所需的时间相当。