Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):E889-94. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181db7432.
Prospective cohort evaluation of C7 plumb line (C7PL) and gravity line (GL) in different standing positions in asymptomatic volunteers.
To evaluate the repeatability of C7PL and GL in different standing positions using an optical method.
Both C7PL and GL have been used to assess spinal balance. However, due to extensive radiation exposure, the measurement repeatability for both C7PL and GL has never been systematically determined.
Thirty asymptomatic adult volunteers were enrolled in this study. Two optical markers were attached to the skin overlying the spinous processes of C7 and S1. Volunteers were instructed to stand on a force plate with their arms in 3 different positions, clavicle, supported, and neutral, for posteroanterior (PA), and lateral views. Digital photos were taken for 12 times for each position. The GL position was displayed on a computer in real time. The distance from the C7 marker to S1 marker (C7-S1) and the distance from the GL to the S1 marker (GL-S1) were measured in both PA and lateral views. The repeatability on a single subject was defined as the standard deviation of the 12 repeated measurements for each standing position.
In the PA view, the repeatability of both C7PL and GL was 3 to 4 mm in all 3 standing positions (all P > 0.05). In the lateral view, the repeatability of C7PL increased from 6 to 8 mm whereas GL remained low at 3 to 4 mm. The GL repeatability was significantly better than that of C7PL in all 3 lateral positions (all P < 0.05). The standing position did not significantly affect repeatability for both C7PL and GL. C7PL had approximately 1-cm posterior shift in the supported position and 2-cm posterior shift in the clavicle position. The effect of various radiographic positions was less than 1 cm for all 3 standing positions in the GL measurement.
The GL measurement was highly reproducible in both PA and lateral views. The repeatability was similar between C7PL and GL despite the standing positions in the PA view. The repeatability of GL was better than that of C7PL in all 3 standing positions in the lateral view. The effect of standing positions was much less in GL than in C7PL.
对无症状志愿者在不同站立位置下 C7 铅垂线(C7PL)和重力线(GL)进行前瞻性队列评估。
使用光学方法评估不同站立位置下 C7PL 和 GL 的可重复性。
C7PL 和 GL 均被用于评估脊柱平衡。然而,由于辐射暴露广泛,C7PL 和 GL 的测量重复性从未被系统确定过。
本研究纳入了 30 名无症状成年志愿者。在 C7 和 S1 的棘突上方皮肤上贴附了两个光学标记。志愿者被要求在测力板上以 3 种不同的手臂位置(锁骨、支撑、中立)站立,拍摄前后位(PA)和侧位的数字照片各 12 次。GL 位置实时显示在计算机上。在 PA 和侧位视图中,测量 C7 标记到 S1 标记的距离(C7-S1)和 GL 到 S1 标记的距离(GL-S1)。对于单个受试者的可重复性,定义为每个站立位置 12 次重复测量的标准差。
在 PA 视图中,所有 3 种站立位置下,C7PL 和 GL 的可重复性均为 3 至 4 毫米(均 P > 0.05)。在侧位视图中,C7PL 的可重复性从 6 至 8 毫米增加,而 GL 仍保持在 3 至 4 毫米。在所有 3 个侧位中,GL 的可重复性均显著优于 C7PL(均 P < 0.05)。站立位置对 C7PL 和 GL 的可重复性均无显著影响。在支撑位时,C7PL 有大约 1 厘米的后移,在锁骨位时有 2 厘米的后移。在 GL 测量中,对于所有 3 种站立位置,各种影像学位置的影响均小于 1 厘米。
在 PA 和侧位视图中,GL 测量具有高度可重复性。尽管在 PA 视图中存在站立位置,但 C7PL 和 GL 的可重复性相似。在侧位视图中,在所有 3 种站立位置下,GL 的可重复性均优于 C7PL。与 C7PL 相比,GL 受站立位置的影响小得多。