Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
J Dent. 2011 May;39(5):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.02.009. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
To evaluate the toothbrush wear resistance of infiltrated artificial white spot lesions following two infiltration strategies, and to assess their ultramorphology.
Flat enamel surfaces from freshly extracted bovine teeth were polished and immersed in a Buskes demineralising solution for 30 days to create incipient caries-like lesions (white spots). Two experimental regions on the surface of each tooth were infiltrated with an infiltrant and a commercial etch-and-rinse adhesive. Toothbrush abrasion was applied for 20,000 cycles. Vertical wear loss of the infiltrated areas was measured after 10,000 and 20,000 cycles against unabraded and abraded enamel using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; multiple t-tests, α=0.05). Each lesion's surface and cross-section were evaluated under CLSM and scanning electron microscopy after etching and infiltration to assess ultramorphology.
After 20,000 abrasion cycles, a statistically non-significant difference in vertical wear loss was measured for the infiltrant versus the adhesive compared with the original enamel (42.6±20.7 μm vs. 40.4±18.5 μm, p>0.05). Irregular surface profiles were common for the adhesive-infiltrated group as a result of peeling and blistering of the resin-covering layer. Ultramorphology of the infiltrated lesions revealed different patterns of penetration regarding density and depth.
Although both infiltration strategies had equivalent wear resistance to toothbrush abrasion, surface and morphological aspects pointed to improved surface stability and infiltration quality for the infiltrant material.
评估两种渗透策略处理后人工牙釉质渗透白斑的耐磨性,并评估其超微形态。
从新鲜提取的牛牙上抛光平面釉质表面,并将其浸入 Buskes 脱矿溶液中 30 天以产生初始龋样病变(白斑)。每颗牙齿表面的两个实验区域用渗透剂和商业酸蚀-冲洗型黏结剂渗透。进行 20000 次牙刷磨损。在 10000 和 20000 次磨损循环后,用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM;多重 t 检验,α=0.05)测量渗透区域相对于未磨损和磨损牙釉质的垂直磨损损失。通过蚀刻和渗透后在 CLSM 和扫描电子显微镜下评估每个病变的表面和横截面,以评估超微形态。
经过 20000 次磨损循环,与原始牙釉质相比,渗透剂与黏结剂之间的垂直磨损损失在统计学上无显著差异(42.6±20.7μm 比 40.4±18.5μm,p>0.05)。黏结剂渗透组的不规则表面轮廓是由于树脂覆盖层的剥落和起泡所致。渗透病变的超微形态显示出不同的渗透密度和深度模式。
尽管两种渗透策略对牙刷磨损都具有等效的耐磨性,但表面和形态方面表明渗透剂材料具有更好的表面稳定性和渗透质量。