The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Crit Care. 2011 Jun;26(3):329.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
The purpose of this study is to estimate the costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit (ICU) (tele-ICU) program.
We used an observational study with ICU patients cared for during the pre-tele-ICU period and ICU patients cared for during the post-tele-ICU period in 6 ICUs at 5 hospitals that are part of a large nonprofit health care system in the Gulf Coast region. We obtained data on a sample of 4142 ICU patients: 2034 in the pre-tele-ICU period and 2108 in the post-tele-ICU period. Economic outcomes were hospital costs, ICU costs and floor costs, measured for average daily costs, costs per case, and costs per patient.
After the implementation of the tele-ICU, the hospital daily cost increased from $4302 to $5340 (24%); the hospital cost per case, from $21,967 to $31,318 (43%); and the cost per patient, from $20,231 to $25,846 (28%). Although the tele-ICU intervention was not cost-effective in patients with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II 50 or less, it was cost-effective in the sickest patients with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II more than 50 (17% of patients) because it decreased hospital mortality without increasing costs significantly.
Hospital administrators may conclude that a tele-ICU program aimed at the sickest patients is cost-effective.
本研究旨在评估远程重症监护病房(ICU)(远程 ICU)计划的成本和成本效益。
我们采用了一项观察性研究,纳入了海湾地区一家大型非营利性医疗保健系统的 5 家医院的 6 个 ICU 中,在远程 ICU 前和远程 ICU 后期间接受治疗的 ICU 患者。我们获得了 4142 名 ICU 患者的样本数据:2034 名患者在远程 ICU 前,2108 名患者在远程 ICU 后。经济结果是医院成本、ICU 成本和病房成本,以平均日成本、每例成本和每位患者成本进行衡量。
远程 ICU 实施后,医院日成本从 4302 美元增加到 5340 美元(24%);医院每例成本从 21967 美元增加到 31318 美元(43%);每位患者成本从 20231 美元增加到 25846 美元(28%)。尽管远程 ICU 干预对简化急性生理学评分 II 小于等于 50 的患者无成本效益,但对评分大于 50 的最病重患者具有成本效益(占患者的 17%),因为它降低了医院死亡率,而没有显著增加成本。
医院管理人员可能会得出结论,针对最病重患者的远程 ICU 计划具有成本效益。