Suppr超能文献

超声引导区域麻醉的镇痛效果:一项荟萃分析。

Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2011 Mar;23(2):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.12.005.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if the use of ultrasound guidance (vs non-ultrasound techniques) improves the success rate of nerve blocks.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the published literature.

SETTING

University medical center.

MEASUREMENTS

16 RCTs of patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were studied. Patients underwent ultrasound-guided or non-ultrasound techniques (nerve stimulation, surface landmark) for peripheral nerve blocks. Success rates were measured.

MAIN RESULTS

Ultrasound guidance (vs all non-ultrasound techniques) was associated with a significant increase in the success rate of nerve blocks [relative risk (RR) = 1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 1.17, P < 0.0001]). When compared with nerve stimulator techniques only, ultrasound guidance was still associated with an increase in the success rate (RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.17, P = 0.0001]). For specific blocks, ultrasound guidance (vs all non-ultrasound) was associated with a significant increase in successful brachial plexus (all) nerve blocks (RR = 1.11 [95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20, P = 0.0001]), sciatic popliteal nerve block (RR = 1.22 [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.39, P = 0.002]) and brachial plexus axillary nerve block (RR = 1.13 [95% CI: 1.00 to 1.26, P = 0.05]) but not brachial plexus infraclavicular nerve block (RR = 1.25 [95% CI: 0.88 to 1.76, P = 0.22]).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block is associated with an increased overall success rate when compared with nerve stimulation or other methods. Ultrasound-guided techniques also increase the success rate of some specific blocks.

摘要

研究目的

确定超声引导(与非超声技术相比)是否提高神经阻滞的成功率。

设计

已发表文献中随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析。

设置

大学医疗中心。

测量

研究了 16 项接受择期手术的患者的 RCT。患者接受超声引导或非超声技术(神经刺激、体表标志)进行外周神经阻滞。测量成功率。

主要结果

与所有非超声技术相比,超声引导与神经阻滞成功率的显著提高相关[相对风险(RR)=1.11(95%置信区间[CI]:1.06 至 1.17,P<0.0001)]。与神经刺激技术相比,超声引导仍与成功率的提高相关(RR=1.11[95%CI:1.05 至 1.17,P=0.0001])。对于特定的阻滞,与所有非超声方法相比,超声引导与臂丛神经(所有)阻滞成功率的显著提高相关(RR=1.11[95%CI:1.05 至 1.17,P=0.0001])、坐骨神经腘窝神经阻滞(RR=1.22[95%CI:1.08 至 1.39,P=0.002])和臂丛神经腋神经阻滞(RR=1.13[95%CI:1.00 至 1.26,P=0.05]),但不包括臂丛神经锁骨下神经阻滞(RR=1.25[95%CI:0.88 至 1.76,P=0.22])。

结论

与神经刺激或其他方法相比,超声引导外周神经阻滞与总体成功率的提高相关。超声引导技术还提高了一些特定阻滞的成功率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验