Zhang Guang Ying, Chen Yi Feng, Dai Wei Xin, Zhang Dan, Huang Yi, He Wen Zheng, Lin Cheng Xin
Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Nov 18;13:4447-4455. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S277473. eCollection 2020.
To investigate the impact of diabetic peripheral neuropathy and its severity on the threshold of sciatic nerve electrical stimulation in diabetic patients.
The case-control study included 60 patients that were divided into non-diabetic patients (control group, n = 26) and diabetic patients (diabetes group, n = 34). All the patients who were scheduled for lower leg, foot, and ankle surgery received a popliteal sciatic nerve block. We recorded the minimum current required to produce motor activity of the sciatic nerve during ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block.
Among the 60 patients, the sciatic nerve innervated muscle contractile response was successfully elicited in 57 patients (dorsiflexion of foot, plantar flexion, foot valgus or adduction, toe flexion, etc.) under electric stimulation. We failed to elicit the motor response in three patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, even when the stimulation current was 3 mA. The average electrical stimulation threshold (1.0 ± 0.7 mA) in the diabetes group was significantly higher than that of the control group (0.4 ± 0.1 mA). Diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy had a higher electrical stimulation threshold (1.2 ± 0.7 mA) than patients without peripheral neuropathy (0.4 ± 0.1 mA). Furthermore, the electrical stimulation threshold of the sciatic nerve in diabetic patients had a linear dependence on the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) peripheral neuropathy score (electrical stimulation threshold [in mA] = 0.125 TCSS score) ( < 0.001).
The threshold of electrical stimulation to elicit a motor response of the sciatic nerve was increased in diabetic patients, and the threshold of electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve increased with the severity of diabetic nerve dysfunction.
探讨糖尿病周围神经病变及其严重程度对糖尿病患者坐骨神经电刺激阈值的影响。
该病例对照研究纳入60例患者,分为非糖尿病患者(对照组,n = 26)和糖尿病患者(糖尿病组,n = 34)。所有计划进行小腿、足部和踝关节手术的患者均接受腘窝坐骨神经阻滞。我们记录了在超声引导下腘窝坐骨神经阻滞期间产生坐骨神经运动活动所需的最小电流。
60例患者中,57例患者(足背屈、跖屈、足外翻或内收、足趾屈曲等)在电刺激下成功引出坐骨神经支配肌肉的收缩反应。3例糖尿病周围神经病变患者即使在刺激电流为3 mA时也未能引出运动反应。糖尿病组的平均电刺激阈值(1.0±0.7 mA)显著高于对照组(0.4±0.1 mA)。有周围神经病变的糖尿病患者的电刺激阈值(1.2±0.7 mA)高于无周围神经病变的患者(0.4±0.1 mA)。此外,糖尿病患者坐骨神经的电刺激阈值与多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)周围神经病变评分呈线性相关(电刺激阈值[mA]=0.125×TCSS评分)(<0.001)。
糖尿病患者引出坐骨神经运动反应的电刺激阈值升高,且坐骨神经电刺激阈值随糖尿病神经功能障碍的严重程度增加而升高。