Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia "S. Luigi Gonzaga", Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano (TO) Italy.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Jun;300(6):H2308-15. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01177.2010. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
We studied whether apelin-13 is cardioprotective against ischemia/reperfusion injury if given as either a pre- or postconditioning mimetic and whether the improved postischemic mechanical recovery induced by apelin-13 depends only on the reduced infarct size or also on a recovery of function of the viable myocardium. We also studied whether nitric oxide (NO) is involved in apelin-induced protection and whether the reported ischemia-induced overexpression of the apelin receptor (APJ) plays a role in cardioprotection. Langendorff-perfused rat hearts underwent 30 min of global ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Left ventricular pressure was recorded. Infarct size and lactate dehydrogenase release were determined to evaluate the severity of myocardial injury. Apelin-13 was infused at 0.5 μM concentration for 20 min either before ischemia or in early reperfusion, without and with NO synthase inhibition by N(G)-nitro-l-arginine (l-NNA). In additional experiments, before ischemia also 1 μM apelin-13 was tested. APJ protein level was measured before and after ischemia. Whereas before ischemia apelin-13 (0.5 and 1.0 μM) was ineffective, after ischemia it reduced infarct size from 54 ± 2% to 26 ± 4% of risk area (P < 0.001) and limited the postischemic myocardial contracture (P < 0.001). l-NNA alone increased postischemic myocardial contracture. This increase was attenuated by apelin-13, which, however, was unable to reduce infarct size. Ischemia increased APJ protein level after 15-min perfusion, i.e., after most of reperfusion injury has occurred. Apelin-13 protects the heart only if given after ischemia. In this protection NO plays an important role. Apelin-13 efficiency as postconditioning mimetic cannot be explained by the increased APJ level.
我们研究了在缺血/再灌注损伤中给予 Apelin-13 作为预处理或后处理模拟物是否具有心脏保护作用,以及 Apelin-13 诱导的缺血后机械恢复改善是否仅取决于梗死面积的减小,还是还取决于存活心肌功能的恢复。我们还研究了一氧化氮 (NO) 是否参与 Apelin 诱导的保护作用,以及报道的缺血诱导的 Apelin 受体 (APJ) 过表达是否在心脏保护中发挥作用。Langendorff 灌注大鼠心脏经历 30 分钟的整体缺血和 120 分钟的再灌注。记录左心室压力。通过测定梗死面积和乳酸脱氢酶释放来评估心肌损伤的严重程度。Apelin-13 以 0.5 μM 浓度在缺血前或早期再灌注时输注 20 分钟,而没有和有一氧化氮合酶抑制剂 N(G)-硝基-l-精氨酸 (l-NNA) 的情况下。在额外的实验中,在缺血前还测试了 1 μM Apelin-13。在缺血前后测量 APJ 蛋白水平。虽然在缺血前 Apelin-13(0.5 和 1.0 μM)无效,但在缺血后它将梗死面积从风险区域的 54±2%减少到 26±4%(P<0.001)并限制了缺血后的心肌收缩(P<0.001)。l-NNA 单独增加了缺血后的心肌收缩。这种增加被 Apelin-13 减弱,但 Apelin-13 无法减少梗死面积。缺血后 15 分钟灌注时 APJ 蛋白水平增加,即在发生大部分再灌注损伤后。Apelin-13 仅在缺血后给予时才能保护心脏。在这种保护作用中,NO 起着重要作用。Apelin-13 作为后处理模拟物的效率不能用增加的 APJ 水平来解释。