Suppr超能文献

使用奇努克鲑和银鲑的野外样本对鲑肾杆菌定量PCR诊断检测方法进行比较和评估。

Comparison and evaluation of Renibacterium salmoninarum quantitative PCR diagnostic assays using field samples of Chinook and coho salmon.

作者信息

Sandell Todd A, Jacobson Kym C

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA.

出版信息

Dis Aquat Organ. 2011 Jan 21;93(2):129-39. doi: 10.3354/dao02289.

Abstract

Renibacterium salmoninarum is a Gram-positive bacterium causing bacterial kidney disease (BKD) in susceptible salmonid fishes. Several quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays to measure R. salmoninarum infection intensity have been reported, but comparison and evaluation of these assays has been limited. Here, we compared 3 qPCR primer/probe sets for detection of R. salmoninarum in field samples of naturally exposed Chinook and coho salmon first identified as positive by nested PCR (nPCR). Additional samples from a hatchery population of Chinook salmon with BKD were included to serve as strong positive controls. The 3 qPCR assays targeted either the multiple copy major soluble antigen (msa) genes or the single copy abc gene. The msa/non-fluorescent quencher (NFQ) assay amplified R. salmoninarum DNA in 53.2% of the nPCR positive samples, whereas the abc/NFQ assay amplified 21.8% of the samples and the abc/TAMRA assay 18.2%. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) successfully quantified only 16.4% of the nPCR positive samples. Although the msa/NFQ assay amplified a greater proportion of nPCR positive samples, the abc/NFQ assay better amplified those samples with medium and high ELISA values. A comparison of the geometric mean quantity ratios highlighted limitations of the assays, and the abc/NFQ assay strongly amplified some samples that were negative in other tests, in contrast to its performance among the sample group as a whole. These data demonstrate that both the msa/NFQ and abc/NFQ qPCR assays are specific and effective at higher infection levels and outperform the ELISA. However, most pathogen studies will continue to require multiple assays to both detect and quantify R. salmoninarum infection.

摘要

鲑肾杆菌是一种革兰氏阳性菌,可导致易感鲑科鱼类患上细菌性肾病(BKD)。已经报道了几种用于测量鲑肾杆菌感染强度的定量PCR(qPCR)检测方法,但对这些检测方法的比较和评估有限。在此,我们比较了3种qPCR引物/探针组,用于检测自然暴露的奇努克鲑和银大麻哈鱼野外样本中的鲑肾杆菌,这些样本最初通过巢式PCR(nPCR)鉴定为阳性。还纳入了来自一个患有BKD的奇努克鲑孵化场种群的其他样本,作为强阳性对照。这3种qPCR检测方法分别针对多拷贝的主要可溶性抗原(msa)基因或单拷贝的abc基因。msa/非荧光淬灭剂(NFQ)检测方法在53.2%的nPCR阳性样本中扩增出了鲑肾杆菌DNA,而abc/NFQ检测方法扩增出了21.8%的样本,abc/TAMRA检测方法扩增出了18.2%的样本。酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)仅成功定量了16.4%的nPCR阳性样本。尽管msa/NFQ检测方法扩增出的nPCR阳性样本比例更高,但abc/NFQ检测方法对那些ELISA值为中高的样本扩增效果更好。几何平均数量比的比较突出了这些检测方法的局限性,并且abc/NFQ检测方法强烈扩增了一些在其他检测中为阴性的样本,这与其在整个样本组中的表现形成对比。这些数据表明,msa/NFQ和abc/NFQ qPCR检测方法在较高感染水平下都是特异且有效的,并且优于ELISA。然而,大多数病原体研究仍将需要多种检测方法来检测和定量鲑肾杆菌感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验