Asthma management failure: a flaw in physicians' behavior or in patients' knowledge?

OBJECTIVES

Patient-physician communication and patients' knowledge about asthma are relevant factors that influence health outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore general practitioners' (GPs) behaviors, asthma patients' knowledge requirements, and the relationship between physicians' communicative issues, and failures in patients' knowledge.

METHODS

GPs participating in a continuing medical education program on asthma completed an ad hoc survey on communicative style and recruited at least three adult asthma patients to indicate, among 10 options, three aspects of asthma about which they felt less informed.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 2332 GPs (mean age 54.39 ± 5.93 years) and 7884 patients (mean age 49.59 ± 18.03 years). Several ineffective strategies emerged in the physicians' behaviors: 28.5% of GPs did not encourage patients to express doubts, expectations, or concerns; 39.4% tried to frighten patients concerning disease-related risks; only 25.7% used a written action plan. In addition, 18.6% of GPs were not averse to informing the patient about potential side effects; 16.3% did not try to simplify asthma treatment; approximately 30% considered ease of use when selecting drugs; 18% were not disposed to carry out a partnership with the patient; 36.9% were unlikely to involve the patient in asthma management; and 73% tried to retain control over their patients. Finally, 90.3% of GPs declared they want to be consulted before any treatment change. The three topics on which patients felt less informed were the meaning of asthma control (14% of patients); integration of asthma into daily life (13.3%); and periodic checkups (12.7%). There were significant associations between patients' choices and physicians' answers.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that in general medicine the recommendations of international guidelines on education, communication, and development of a doctor-patient partnership are still ignored and that patients' educational priorities may differ from those identified by medical specialists and by patients belonging to patients' associations.