Shariati Vahideh, Basiri Reza, Iravani Farzaneh, Esmaily Habibollah, Farid Hosseiny Reza, Jabbari Azad Farahzad
Specialist of Internal Medicine, Internal Department, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Lung Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Tanaffos. 2020 Jan;19(1):38-44.
Asthma is a common condition in which the patient requires self-management and teaching programs that lead to reduced prevalence and mortality. The main aim of this study was to improve the management knowledge of the disease through the use of educational tools, pamphlets and face-to-face lecture, concurrent with evaluating and comparing its effectiveness in response to treatment.
In this study, 82 asthmatic patients were enrolled. Training necessary to control the disease and use of drugs were provided to patients in one group by pamphlets (39 patients) and the other by face-to-face education (43 patients). After a month, Disease control examination and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores were evaluated and compared.
The mean age of participants was 39.12±14.25 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender and education (P> 0.05) and no significant difference in asthma control between the two groups before the intervention (P = 0.065). The overall asthma control score in the pamphlet was increased from 15.43±4.99 at baseline to 20.58±4.47 in the assessment after one month education (P <0.001) and in face-to-face training an overall score was increased from 13.27±5.39 to 21.95±2.77 (P <0.001). After one month education, asthma control score was increased 5.23 ± 6.88 in pamphlets group and 8.9 ± 6.32 in face-to-face group (P = 0.014).
Evaluation of both educational methods showed face-to-face training is more efficient.
哮喘是一种常见病症，患者需要进行自我管理并接受相关教学项目，以降低发病率和死亡率。本研究的主要目的是通过使用教育工具、宣传册和面对面讲座来提高对该疾病的管理知识，同时评估和比较其在治疗反应方面的有效性。
本研究纳入了82名哮喘患者。一组（39名患者）通过宣传册向患者提供控制疾病和使用药物所需的培训，另一组（43名患者）则通过面对面教育提供培训。一个月后，对疾病控制检查和哮喘控制测试（ACT）得分进行评估和比较。
参与者的平均年龄为39.12±14.25岁。两组在年龄、性别和教育程度方面无显著差异（P>0.05），干预前两组在哮喘控制方面也无显著差异（P = 0.065）。宣传册组的总体哮喘控制评分从基线时的15.43±4.99提高到一个月教育后的评估中的20.58±4.47（P <0.001），面对面培训组的总体评分从13.27±5.39提高到21.95±2.77（P <0.001）。一个月教育后，宣传册组的哮喘控制评分提高了5.23±6.88，面对面组提高了8.9±6.32（P = 0.014）。
对两种教育方法的评估表明，面对面培训更有效。
